this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)

Asklemmy

49189 readers
573 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For those of you who travel in the united states, you'll know they now have facial recognition scans when checking your id. You can opt out by telling them you don't want to take the picture. I do every time, but I wonder what the point of the scan is if you can just opt out. That given, why do you think they do it? What prevents them from forcing you to do it?

To those of you who live outside of the united states, have you seen a similar increase in security at your airports?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] edel@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 days ago (3 children)

For visa holders and green cards they have been doing that for a decade at least, I wonder if it is optional for them too.

Regarding opting out, we should. It is inconvenient, we get faces, but we should.

  1. The more scans they get of your face (age, expressions,...) , the more accurate their profile of you will be...
  2. To make an statement. If we just accept these things, they will keep pushing for more.
[โ€“] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If we just accept these things, they will keep pushing for more.

They are going to do whatever they want to do. They've long passed the point of caring if they anger people.

[โ€“] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What recourse do we have otherwise? Sure it's unlikely to change anything, but it doesn't cost anything either.

[โ€“] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Luigiing the leader at the top. And also the entire remaining top.

At this point, that is the only answer. They won't stop until everyone is dead.

load more comments (1 replies)