this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
1359 points (97.8% liked)

Bluesky

1381 readers
2143 users here now

People skeeting stuff.

Bluesky Social is a microblogging social platform being developed in conjunction with the decentralized AT Protocol. Previously invite-only, the flagship Beta app went public in February 2024. All are welcome!

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Stalin did massively advance Russian science and industrialization. But he did so at a massive human toll. Also his role in fighting Hitler is so minimized that people think he colluded with Hitler when the USSR basically defeated Hitler by themselves at Stalingrad and America swooped in afterwards.

[–] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The USSR did the greater part in defeating nazi Germany, seriously nobody who knows a thing about the fall of the 3rd Reich could deny that. They did so at a huge cost in soldiers and material. This is something that the world should thank the people of the USSR for, their sacrifice was terrible. However it was not Stalin defeating the nazi's single handedly. His troops and officers did, nor did Stalin do this out of the goodness of his heart or through personal heroics. It was a fight for survival.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

The Nazis lost at Stalingrad. Only after their defeat and being pushed back, America swooped in and took over Europe before Russia could.

Then they saved the Nazi scientists and officers and gave them top positions in NATO.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz -2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

So did hitler. Only people praising hitler are same ones praising stalin.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago

No, he really didn't

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Hitler did play a big role in killing Hitler. That much is true.