this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
706 points (97.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

8794 readers
2424 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brisk@aussie.zone 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"You" is the plural of "thou". It even has plural grammar ("you are", not "you is")

[–] ExhibiCat@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought you was the more respectful form of thou in singular, and "ye" was the plural form of that. In Ireland you still hear ye used for plural you sometimes.

By more respectful i mean similar to usted in Spanish or vous in French

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

I thought you was the more respectful form of thou in singular, and “ye” was the plural form of that. In Ireland you still hear ye used for plural you sometimes.

Originally the difference between ġē→ye→ye and ēow→yow→you wasn't one of number, but of case: you'd use "ye" for the subject, "you" for the subject, regardless of being a plural or a respectful singular. Much like "I" vs. "me". Eventually however "you" displaced "ye" even for the subject role, in most varieties; what you see in Hiberno English is also an innovation, but a different one.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You’re saying that as if you speak to an individual and say “you is”. Do you do that?

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's almost the opposite of what I said.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So, singular “you” also has this “plural grammar” you mention and we don’t say “thou” anymore. So what’s your point, then?

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That was my point.

You said find a plural for "you".

I said that "you" is already a plural.

That's it, there's nothing deeper.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok, then demand we bring “thou” back with the same fervor. Maybe I’m missing that crusade in your life but if you’re gunna go around acting like “they” is difficult I would expect equal frustration with “you”, no?

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't recall ever suggesting that "they" is difficult. I have in the past used analogy to "you" to help people get comfortable using "they".

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You said it takes mental effort and I’m on a bit of a crusade. Fine, fair enough, but you did bring up unnecessary friction and shit like that is often used as an excuse to not try as hard or excuse people that don’t want to try at all(though yes, you do try).