this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
109 points (99.1% liked)

United Kingdom

5234 readers
388 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

4 years!

Of course it’s fucked up and whatever, but this feels like a populist sentence. 4 years is an incredibly long time. In what way is this adequate for the crime. Like mentioned before, there is infinite damage being done to nature in the name of business, very rarely somebody is getting a little bit of blowback, and these two guys, who really don’t have much potential to destroy anything more are sent away as an example? To whom? The generally misbehaving public?

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

In what way is this adequate for the crime

What is the maximum sentence for damage of public property?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This was deliberate, planned, and done purely to destroy something others enjoyed.

I'd say it's about right.

[–] Berstrrs@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 weeks ago

Is building a housing estate on a green belt or a park not deliberate, planned, and done purely to destroy something others enjoyed?

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Cool yeah, let's have short sentences for destroying cultural landmarks. I'm sure that'll be fine.

We both know that these men will, unfortunately, be out far sooner than 4 years time.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

They shouldn't be inside at all. We don't have the prison space to spend on things like this. It should be dealt with in the community.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I.e. translating to no real punishment. For permanently destroying a historically significant site, then constantly lying in court.

I'm sure there would be zero repercussions from that.

Jesus Christ, I am immensely thankful you aren't a judge or legislator.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

How, exactly, would one do that? Especially considering these men seem to have no community spirit whatsoever?

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Get them in the stocks to be pelted by tomatoes by the community

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 3 weeks ago

Not quite what I was thinking, but better than 4 years a piece.