423
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maximilious@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I really want to go electric, but the milage just isn't there yet for me, and add in the charging time and new maintenance routines of swapping out those batteries. I just haven't done enough research.

I don't think there's anything bad with giving the manufacturers money to switch their entire production facilities to electric, I just hope the government actually understands what those funds are being used for, unlike the money they gave our ISPs for infrastructure upgrades that went to waste.

The shells may be similar or the same but inside it would be like asking an apple orchard to change all their trees to oranges, and these funds will help expedite that.

[-] FirmRip@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I get 300 mile range and can recharge from 20-80% in under a half hour (a road trip lunch break).

It’s getting there quickly!

[-] GregoryTheGreat@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Mileage seems fine to me. My gas car gets 260-280 maybe. Electric hits similar numbers.

Charge times are getting pretty low too. 20 minutes is becoming common to hear a new car doing 20-80%. That’s slower than gas but also I’ll only do that in a pinch. Most charging will be at home during the night.

The maintenance differences are a mixed bag though. I think a lot of EVs will be essentially disposed of once the batteries are showing age.

If the phone industry can reach us anything it is manufacturers will make it expensive to change or not make the batteries.

With all that said. Giving car companies money to help them mine rare metals in 3rd world countries, buy motors from China, assemble cars in Mexico and the US…idk how that makes financial sense.

And before anyone tells me the money is only for US plants…I’ll ask you to get real.

[-] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Man, I forget how shitty most peoples gas cars are sometimes. 260 miles from a full tank? That’s like 26mpg if you have a 10gallon tank, which is unlikely. My car is 15 years old and gets 40mpg, the hybrids in my household get 50+. How tf do you afford to drive getting mileage like that?

[-] GregoryTheGreat@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

13 gallon but lots of city driving. Also a 2015 so not very old.

I afford it by working from home lol.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

How often do you drive more than 100 miles away? People average 33 miles a day in the US and less than 1% of trips are over 100 miles. I would venture to guess almost never. Range is really not much of an issue for 99% of people. The only instances where charge time is an issue is those less than 1% of trips that are over 100 miles.

Maintenance is also not much of an issue. There is significantly less maintenance with an EV. For the battery, they generally hold their charge pretty damn well and most can go 300k miles before their full battery level degrades to 80% of the original range.

Not saying their are not issues because there absolutely are. But the issue with them is affordability and charging infrastructure reliability. At least in the US, we have a mediocre amount of fast charge stations but one of the main providers, Electrify America, has shit reliability. You would think VW, who was forced to build the Electrify America system, would actually want to make it profitable and also use it as PR showing that they have changed. But nope. They treat it like the red headed step child that they were forced to do and resent it. Fuck VW.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This right here. I had a phev that got 30 miles off the battery. If I worked a regular job that would be more than enough especially if I could trickle charge at work.

Maintenance you're spot on and don't forget to account for the intangibles like having to make that appointment for an oil change, etc and then having to either drop the car off or sit around while they do the work. Data coming from years of tesla, prius, etc is showing batteries lasting even longer and holding even more charge than the engineers predicted when designing and testing. I wouldn't be surprised if we eventually see evs with 500k+ on the original battery and that's not including some of the cells being repaired or swapped out.

As for charging. In most big cities there are chargers literally everywhere. I run my own livery and work uber, etc so I'm everywhere in my current state. I'm seeing apt complexes put in charging stations backed by Duke Power, I'm also seeing stores like Publix with free charging, simply plug and play versus having to activate it. Parking garages in Charlotte and Greensboro have them including at the airports, Greensboro also has at least one charging setup with a solar canopy for shade. WFU has a ton of free chargers around campus and nearby.

The charging infrastructure has a long way to go but we are miles ahead of where we were just 5 years ago. Those with a house or who can convince a hoa or complex can charge at home and always wake up to a full tank.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

They’re working on improving range, it just isn’t there yet. Recharge overnight at home if you have a garage and it will likely never be a problem, in the vent you don’t have a place to charge slowly overnight or need a charge up on a trip then super chargers are being added all over the place daily, with government investment helping that as well. The maintenance routine is nothing, you need a new battery after nearly a decade, most people are getting a new car on that schedule, even if you plan to keep a car for decades you’ll have major repairs/replacements on a ice vehicle just as much if not more than electric.

Swapping ice to electric isn’t that difficult, ford even sells a crate electric motor and the tools/instructions to replace a gas engine with it in nearly any vehicle.

I fully agree that the government needs to set guidelines, controls, and a series of deep audits over several decades to ensure this money is being spent appropriately. Too often they just hand out cash to corps with no follow up to make sure it didn’t get spent on bonuses

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

What do you mean the range isn't there yet? How often do you travel 300+ miles between a charge?

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

I would 2-3 times a year. And when I did it would be probably 3 charges in each direction, maybe 4 considering heat and a/c and several suitcases of weight. Enough that it wouldn't be convenient, but that's why we'll keep an ICE van around for a while yet.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So you choose to inconvenience yourself 2-3 times a month because of something you only do 2-3 times a year? I get people who complain about range when they take road trips every month or live in very cold climates or have long commutes, but 2-3 times a year you can rent a car for the money you would save on gas and maintenance.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

No idea what you're talking about, but it's our second vehicle. Primary is a Volt, so PHEV with the longest range. Most days we use no gas because I work from home and we only use the van a couple times a week when the kids need to be in different places at the same time.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Why not use the Volt for the long trips? It uses gas.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Too small. I mean it holds an impressive amount, but I can't take my wife, a 13 year old, and an 11 year old on a week vacation in it.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Every time I go home to see my family, I’d have to stop halfway and sit at a charger for a bit. That’s why I own a hybrid now since electric doesn’t meet my needs and EVs are still so damned expensive

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No airport in villages in the middle of nowhere my dude. Nearest airport I could get a flight into is an hour+ away and I’d have to drive at least 45 minutes to an airport small enough to fly into it. The only real feasible way to get there is drive since America refuses to build non-freight trains

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Welp, sounds like you drive waaaaaaaaay more than the average. You live in the middle of the wilderness and frequently drive 500 miles each way. You're an edge case so it's gonna be a while before a solution is developed for you.

Fortunately, there's few enough people in your position that if only the people who drive such an extraordinary amount use ICE vehicles, it will be a tiny contribution to climate change.

If your daily driving is <50 miles or so, a plug-in hybrid is a good option. That way you only burn gas on those long trips.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

For much of the Midwest it’s like this, younger generations move to the cities but our parents/grandparents are out in the wilderness still. Yea I have to drive 300 miles to get to them, but that’s far from unique for millennials in the cities

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

300 miles is almost the entire length of Kansas. And to make that trip often enough that stopping at a supercharger is a hassle? Yeah, that's abnormal.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Idk what to say, these trips aren’t thought of as much by midwesterners that didn’t grow up in the cities. There are half a dozen from my graduating class of 70 that also came to the same city as me and make similar trips at least once a month back home, you’ve got holidays, births, weddings, funerals, all of those are a 300 mile each way trip. Hybrid is the best kid tof us can do right now, America refuses to build trains and airplanes can’t be expected to have flights to the middle of nowhere

[-] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

My ice vehicle is nigh 2 decades old and besides wear parts my total investment on repairs is under $500. I'm still getting 30 mpg and although I'm not anti electric 15 years of no car payment is hard to beat.

[-] mars296@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

How is that possible? Tires alone will be that cost. Oil changes over 20 years? Even if you only changed oil annually for 20 years for $20 thats $400.

Not that you should ditch your car. I have a 12 year old with similar performance.

[-] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I specifically excluded wear parts. At 300k miles I've replaced the tires about 4 times (they wear in the front but i move them to the back and they seem to last forever), the brakes & pads/drums & fluids twice although the second time was due to an error in installation on my part, belts once, headlamps once, spark plugs twice, and wiper blades bi-yearly. The alternator was my only non-wear repair and that came in around $300. Also note i do all my own work which i have no confidence for in an electric vehicle although i have to claim complete ignorance, some systems may be identical...

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

People really overstate the maintenance difference. It's basically oil changes, which with synthetic oils are a 2-3 times per year thing depending on driving amounts. In electrics, you have a massive battery that's going to dictate the value of the car at around the ten year mark, an ice car can be 7-10k, but electric is either 0 or pay 15k to have a car maybe worth that much or slightly more.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Are your tires and brake pads bald as fuck? Neither of those are cheap and have to be done every few years on ICE vehicles.

You are horribly underestimating battery lifespan. They are warrantied for 10 years. They average about 300k miles before dropping to 80% of their original charge. If you are fine with that, many are fine to go longer.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Tires wear the same on battery cars. Brakes are similar, though they were less due to regenerative braking, they also need to be bigger for the heavier weight.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Significantly less for brakes. That regenerative braking does the vast majority of the work unless you are slamming on the brakes often.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Brakes wear way way less on EVs. You basically never use the brakes. Yes, the EV is heavier, but the regen is strong enough to slow down a car in all but the hardest of braking circumstances.

There are also timing belts, engine seals, coolant flush and fills (there's a debate on whether that is worth it), transmission fluid, oil filters, air filters, spark plugs, and the lead acid battery. None of those are really a thing on EVs except the battery, but it's much smaller and cheaper.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Charging needs a huge overhaul and standardization at a minimum. Being able to charge at home helps, but that's 50% or less of people can do it. The big problem is travel, there's way to many different apps, broken chargers, and not actually fast chargers. Especially outside Tesla's super chargers.

this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
423 points (97.1% liked)

News

23644 readers
3675 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS