this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
478 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

16030 readers
2316 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maxwellfire@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

A problem with this is that the river presumably goes all the way around the earth. Otherwise you could just travel west until you found its end. You really need a donut shaped earth, a sphere doesn't help much

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But the river running round the whole planet does not matter in this case.

[–] maxwellfire@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You run into it on the planet backside and then need another bridge, right?

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What about an opposite bridge where you cross under the river? Some sort of tubular subterranean structure. We could call them opposite bridges.

[–] maxwellfire@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

That would make the earth a donut lol and would work!

[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Won't be in Königsberg anymore though, so that bridge won't count

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago

Surely it a river doesn't go all the way around the earth. Rivers typically have one (or many) start points, where they are surrounded on three sides by land, meaning it's possible to cross from one side to the other. Otherwise it's just a strait or channel.

However, that assumes you are not on the land in between a fork in the river. In which case you would have to cross a bridge outside of Königsberg, and we might have to expand the problem to crossing every bridge on the continent once.

[–] oo1 1 points 1 week ago

I mean that might be theoretically possible with some geothermal energy input at some point, but practically speaking all rivers I've observed do not do this.

It seems likely that there is land between the source and the mouth.

It should be fairly easy for someone to visit the sources of the Elbe to test this presumption with real science.