this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
51 points (93.2% liked)

TechTakes

2080 readers
93 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
51
It’s “frighteningly likely” many US courts will overlook AI errors, expert says (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 days ago by artifex@piefed.social to c/techtakes@awful.systems
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

While the thought of lawyers lawyering with AI gives me the icks, I also understand that at a certain point it may play out like the self-driving car argument: once the AI is good enough, it will be better than the average human -- since I think it's obvious to everyone that human lawyers make plenty of mistakes. So if you knew the average lawyer made 3.6 mistakes per case and the AI only made 1.2, it's still a net gain. On the other hand tho, this could lead to complacency that drives even more injustice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corbin@awful.systems 11 points 2 days ago

It's hard to get into the article's mood when I know that Lexis not only still exists but is now part of the Elsevier family; this is far from the worst thing that attorneys choose to do to themselves and others. Lawyers have been caught using OpenAI products in court filings and court appearances, and they have been punished accordingly; the legal profession does not seem prepared to let a "few hallucinated citations go overlooked," to quote the article's talking head.