this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
177 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2085 readers
113 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mii@awful.systems 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

AI use at my company is now mandatory. We all have gotten really expensive Claude of ChatGPT licenses and (apparently) it's being monitored whether we actually use them. For while I've resisted, telling everyone I don't touch that shit with a ten-foot pole. Now I just write the occasional non-invasive prompt ("check for spelling errors in the comments" or "format the buffer so that all lines have less than 80 columns) just so someone can report to the c-suite that our department is using AI.

Meanwhile I have to do code reviews on patches that have been actually written by a chatbot and doing that takes sometimes as long as writing the whole fucking code from scratch.

But hey, style guidelines are out the window too because the slop machine can't follow them consistently anyway and apparently fixing that shit manually is too much to ask. So at least I never have to fight anyone again over indentation and braces.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Find out who made it mandatory, then CC them on every error the bot makes ever

Bonus points if it make an "agentic" LLM 8 ball do the forwarding for you

Meanwhile I have to do code reviews on patches that have been actually written by a chatbot and doing that takes sometimes as long as writing the whole fucking code from scratch.

Yeah I've had to do this too. It's lovely isn't it? You do all the work and someone else who half-assed a prompt and sent out a change without even reading it gets most of the credit.