this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
1155 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

73939 readers
3940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

They would still have to comply with the laws of the places the site can operate in, regardless of its physical server location.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 13 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] archchan@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I feel like if most websites chose not to comply, there's fuck all the government could do tbh. What are they gonna do? Fine big tech with a slap on the wrist again? Try to shut down every indie hentai site hosted in the Congo or something? Please... it's all absurd.

[–] Patches@ttrpg.network 7 points 2 weeks ago

They would start up their own Great FireWall of [Blank]

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or have your site taken down by your own country because of its international obligations. You still have to abide by your own country's interpretation (and political alignment to) of foreign laws.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I doubt that the USA would recognise and take down websites for not following Ofcoms requirements. And Ofcom would 100% be too cowardly to even threaten that. They'd just geoblock.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Perhaps? But you can get extradited from the US to the UK, and there's all sorts of dumb agreements for international evidence and standing precedent. I don't expect the current administration to forge new ground here, but navigating the waters of international law is byzantine at the best of times.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I really, really doubt that a website owner based in USA would be extradited to the UK for not complying with UK local law with how they run their website. That's absurd.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe if they were a UK citizen living in the US, but if it was a US citizen, not a chance.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Civil action. The case may be resolved in your favor, since it will be done in your country's court, but you'd still have to deal with court fees.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

The website would be blocked at the ISP level, I'm not sure what the UK government can do beyond that.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

If I had the money for lawyers, I would definitely add an "I confirm I am not in UK" button to access to sites to "help people mistakenly identified as being in the UK due to e.g. a VPN or a proxy".