this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
547 points (99.5% liked)

unix_surrealism

2947 readers
1 users here now

one should not chase the electric dream

A place to share original content related to computers, content, surrealism, wizardry and everything else.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CsXGF8uzUAOh6fqV@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago (6 children)

This is so IRL. It was the last drop in the bucket when using systemd, when it started to let me wait out a countdown every time I shut it down. I would just flip the power supply switch. Then I switched from Arch to Artix.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It’s fun to watch that countdown with a non-removable laptop battery that is about to die. Problem solved it’s self I guess. Edit: Alpine Linux now.

[–] jaschop@awful.systems 18 points 2 months ago

I was pretty sure systemd doesn't have to be configured like that. Anyway, on my company managed Linux systemd tries to access some network service on startup and shutdown. Unless I'm plugged into on site LAN, I get to wait a full network timeout (presumably with retries) every time.

At least it's not Windows.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

probably just because it's doing the correct thing and waiting for the applications in your session to close?

[–] CsXGF8uzUAOh6fqV@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In principle, but it did never hurt anything when I just straight up cut the power so I got the feeling that I was waiting for nothing. It wasn't like the disk wasn't flushed yet or anything. Maybe it is good to be extra careful when restarting a server or something similar, but for desktop usage I prefer if the init system just kills everything after a few seconds so I can go with my day. Neither is right or wrong just whatever you prefer. I like a cutthroat style in general and I accept the minor risks that come with it.

[–] rdri@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's not a good practice to allow immediate shutdown on a PC, as long as the OS doesn't do checks for finished data transfers. You will lose data if SSD is not finished writing it. Yes, even with super fast SSD there might be stuff that takes seconds to complete.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

yeah makes sense ig, i very frequently long hold the power button when i have to deal with w*ndows

[–] match@pawb.social 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the system is going down for shutdown NOW!

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Whether the system likes it or not

[–] izder456@ieji.de 7 points 2 months ago

@CsXGF8uzUAOh6fqV @NoFood4u fuck systems with timers on shutdown
I want it to respect my acpi events
I meant it when I pushed the button

[–] psud@aussie.zone 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The command is shutdown -h now

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Personally I prefer poweroff