this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
74 points (66.1% liked)
Asklemmy
50670 readers
680 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, this is just untrue for both accounts.
The PRC and RF have largely been peaceful over the last few decades, the most notable exception being, of course, the Russo-Ukrainian War. On the other hand, the West has been on an extermination campaign of genocide in Palestine, destroyed Iraq, bombed Iran, destroyed Afghanistan, supported coups all over South America and Africa, and much, much more. If you extend beyond a few decadea you also can include the attempted genocide of Korea and Vietnam.
Not only is quality of life in the PRC higher than some EU states as well as US, the EU and US both enjoy the quality of life they do because of imperialism. That's like pointing to a landlord and saying they have a higher quality of life than their tenant, and using that as a point in favor of the landlord and against the tenant. Imperialism is the reason why the Global North consumes far more of production than it creates, and what drives the Global North to sanction, coup, invade, destroy, and genocide the Global South.
I extended beyond the last 2 decades, I just kept it to 2 decades initially because it's the most relevant for our discussion. The PRC has not "gone to war" with pretty much everyone around them, with the exception of Vietnam, in the last 50 years. They do not support terrorist groups, and they have not slaughtered millions of their own people. They do not strip their population of basic freedoms, the opposite is true, and they do not force Han supremacy, they have higher rates of minority representation than the west does. They are not imperialist, they do not use financial capital to dominate the global south and expropriate vast amounts of wealth, nor is Chinese culture "soulless."
Your whole comment is entirely uncited, and veers into being wildly racist by calling Chinese culture soulless.
As for quality of life, I didn't expect you to go fully mask-off and justify imperialism, but holy shit you just outright called it an "irrelevant excuse." If I point out that Elon Musk has a better quality of life than I do because of vast amounts of wealth stolen from the working class, that's somehow irrelevant and Elon is good in your eyes? This is monstrous behavior. Do some self-crit and see how the west plunders the global south.
Again, everything you listed is uncited, and your claims are racist in nature, like calling Chinese culture "soulless" because it's now socialist and Mao banned foot-binding. Yes, I do quite like the democracy graph, it shows that the PRC is ahead of the west in democracy. The PRC has done nowhere near the atrocities of the west. It doesn't imperialize, commit genocide, or otherwise plunder the world for its own benefit.
You have no sources because you're genuinely a fascist that defends western imperialism unironically.
Wars China has been in, in the last 50 years:
From your own link:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Soviet_border_conflict
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathu_La_and_Cho_La_clashes
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960%E2%80%9361_campaign_at_the_China%E2%80%93Burma_border
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Chamdo
Some are outside the 50 year mark by a decade or two but it shows in the last 50 years theyve pretty much attacked every single country around them.
Then don't include them, you dishonest fuck.
You literally had to include things from outside the time period to pad the numbers and you still only got to five. Now do the US and EUs wars for the same time period.
I wish I lived in your world where time is non-linear.
No, they come out much worse. Oh right, you don't consider non-westerners to be human.
Imagine how completely shameless and dishonest to try and make this claim as a contrast to the EU and USA.
And that's what matters, in the end. Virtue is defined by how much wealth you can extract out of the rest of the world for the benifit of your own country. Wealth is the mark of virtue. Rich countries are good, poor countries are bad.
You have the politics of a nineteenth century Englishman.
You mean you tried to respond but realized you didn't actually have anything to respond with, so you're going to start trolling.
There is nothing of substance to respond to even if I wanted. All you've done is disagree and I'm not wasting my time going through history with a bot who thinks tiananmen square was just a man standing in front of a tank or thinks NATO "forced" Russia to invade Ukraine. So yeah, enjoy this thread it was made for you.
There's plenty of substance, you just can't actually refute it so you're going to pretend it's not there. You've already decided as a matter of faith that you are right about anything, so any argument that might suggest otherwise has to be ignored.
Oh, we're just pulling completely baseless strawmen out of our assholes then? Well why should I waste my time with you when you're a supporter of Adolf Hitler who thinks the Holocaust was a good thing?
βNever believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.β
β Jean-Paul Sartre
Lol, literally "I know you are, but what am I?"