this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
101 points (93.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

37214 readers
695 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like they could cool their shit, and desalinate water with the waste heat. Provide water to dry areas. Like Baja or Texas. Bonus points if they could run off renewables. Seems like a win win

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 96 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Because salt is corrosive, and the real estate is expensive.

Why not build in the cold north? Snow, ice breaking stuff, more expensive construction and work.


There’s a common misconception that these data centers are so big to literally suck up all resources… that’s not it.

It’s just corpos cheaping out.

Why the desert? Because evaporative cooling is cheap as heck, and low power, and works best in dry air. And the land is cheap. And grid energy is cheap.

Why local power plants and generators? Because it’s cheaper than grid energy; it cuts out the middle man. And it increases reliability. Not because there’s literally not grid capacity.


Hence, you are onto a thermodynamically interesting idea. The waste heat could be a “preheater” for desalination.

But of course they are not going to do that: it would cost more money.

Nor would they hook up the waste heat to local communities. Why would they pay to do that and extend construction time?

Also, as a counterpoint, osmotic desalination (which requires no heat) tends to be cheaper anyway, but is still a very, very expensive water source.

[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

One thing I will say is here in the desert, we don't actually want them either. Water is already an issue. Power costs are already an issue when you're cooling your house all summer/heating it all winter. Data centers provide minimal jobs for the amount of resources they use in a community and the downsides have been discovered in a number of places around the country too (ranging from noise to increased costs to resource shortages). Keep your data centers off our cactii!

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It would be fine if they developed solar, used closed loop or geothermal systems, distributed waste heat and such as compensation. It honestly wouldn't be a bad plan compared to other places, seeing how the copious sun, dry winters, and still relatively cheap land would be great for operations.

But no, they only want the absolute cheapest route out there.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They dont even need to hook up and construct a geothermal heat system for a community, either. There are giant sand heat batteries in norway to store excess heat that they then tap into their community heat systems.

These data centers could be responsible to build the giant sand battery and then be done with it, leaving the distribution to the municipality or state, but they aren't even inclined to do that.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It sounds a little complex in a desert because (AFAIK) data centers produce relatively low-level heat, and in the summer the inlet side would need to be cooled significantly. This sounds like less of an issue in Norway with relatively low average temperatures.

The medium would be cheap as heck though.

Another confounding factor is the necessity of water cooling. I think data centers like evaporators because they can use dirt cheap and standard air cooled servers, and simply A/C the room with the evaporators, where more complex systems would need larger air heat exchangers and a well below ambient return.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The answer, as always, is profit.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Short term gain, specifically.

They want the data center up and cheaply built to make next quarter look good, not lower their costs long term.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Fuck man... I'm so over capitalism. Shits just exhausting...

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

The boiling method is used when there are industrial processes that generate a lot of waste heat. You can make it reasonably efficient by taking the heat away on the cooling side and recirculating it back to the hot end.

But yes, datacenters don't really generate enough heat for that to work without heat pumps concentrating it. All your other points stand.