this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
436 points (97.0% liked)

Not The Onion

17654 readers
671 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 52 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Loomer's word is utterly worthless, and, unless she actually saw Graham having sex with someone, her opinion is nothing but hearsay anyway.

And there are plenty of valid reasons to despise Graham, but his sexuality isn't one.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nobody hates Lindsay Graham for being gay, the hate is that he’s gay and a bigot.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I hate Lindsey Graham for having the audacity to talk and act the way he does while not even owning a seersucker suit.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Idk if we should be extra mad at a bigot just because they are gay. Seems to me like we should be the normal amount of mad

[–] cjoll4@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We're not extra mad because he's gay, we're extra mad because he's a hypocrite.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've yet to find a bigot who isn't a hypocrite. The firm belief that rules are for their lessers is basically the core tenet of conservatism in 2025

[–] Soulg@ani.social 7 points 2 days ago

You should be extra mad about someone being publicly anti gay but privately gay

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

If someone is a bigot, that's one reason to be mad at them.

If someone is a bigot or allies with bigots against something that they themselves are (publicly or privately), that's at least three reasons to be mad at them: bigotry, hypocrisy, and betrayal of other people who are the same thing.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I agree. I'm mad at him because he has betrayed the people of the country he is supposed to serve more times than I can count. Sexuality, gender, race, etc. have no bearing on my feelings about him.

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you want to regret having eyes, read the Grahams "lady big" story.

I think it was last left as a fake story.

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

You mean "lady bug"

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Even if, no external observation can prove or disprove sexuality.

Also, this is news to nobody.