this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
754 points (96.1% liked)

memes

16906 readers
3808 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The race may already be lost, but still.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 35 points 4 days ago (4 children)

what about using thumbs up/down and computing a five-star rating from the average?

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

this system can skew the average towards negative

say someone found a hair in their soup but otherwise the experience was amazing - even if they're peak karen they'd still probably give something like 3 stars, but if faced with a binary choice they'd probably pick the negative option

unless you mean up/down vote per each quality like atmosphere, food, hygine, service etc then that'd preserve the nuance imo

[–] lime@feddit.nu 8 points 4 days ago

no, no nuance. only yes or no.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

alternatively it skews the average towards positive: shit i found a hair in my soup! that indicates bad hygiene it the service was so good and i don’t want the wait staff to suffer! i’d probably go 3 stars but this is a thumbs down

it all comes out in the wash: 1 hair in 1 soup, doesn’t matter… many hairs in many soups, place deserves a 0 not a 3

[–] seliaste@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

On steam it makes it so that universally good but not exceptional games get overwhelmingly positive reviews, but like a 3.5 star average on backloggd

[–] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

still more accurate than 5 star bullshit, infact tthe most accurate one I have seen

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Now i don't know if i should upvote fpor thinking outside the box or downvote for the faults in it. Maybe if we had 3 options? But then, what if the idea only has one fault and more positives? Maybe 5 options...?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

compromise: you need to write a 1000 word review at at least a 12th grade level and we use automated sentiment analysis to set the score.

still only as thumbs up or down though.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

You just described the entirety of my career on ePinions back in the day. I made bank off of that stupid website even though commenters with short attention spans constantly complained I was too verbose. Many dumb early 2000s computer parts were paid for via that avenue.

I made the top 100 at one point. I still have the hat they sent me someplace.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I like a three point rating. Disappointing, As Expected, Awesome.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

add a second rating, 1 for service, 1 for management. that way server 5* management 1*