this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
897 points (98.8% liked)

Linux

8983 readers
1327 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I disagree. Soviets were busy recovering from WW2 for decades while funding own allies. They were not in the position to splurge on non necessities.

But even with that - they supplied entire population with oil, gas, electric no problems. Utilities barely cost anything even in modern russia

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

In the USSR, private plots owned by collective farm families, averaging 0.25 hectares in area, provided 30% of meat, vegetables and milk, 33% of eggs, and 59% of potatoes in 1979.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Bet the land was taken better care of when its a family that owns it compared to some minimum wage workers hired by a mega farm.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Yes, although I was referring to the fact that every experiment in collectivized agriculture in the 20th century boils down to: A minuscule percentage of the plots were left to private initiative and those plots account for the majority of the total output.

[–] lightnegative@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

No problems? I think some of the citizens that lived through the Soviet era would disagree with you there