Asklemmy

49995 readers

686 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

Would it possible or at least plausible for someone with no prior experience of handling or shooting firearms to become a good shooter? (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 1 day ago by qyron@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For context

I have heard my fair share of tall tales of how someone went up for their military service and they got noticed as a good shooter and got sent or at least invited to join the marksman course.

My question

But what I would like to know is if someone, let's say in their late twenties to mid thirties was to be forced by some event of their life to pick up shooting as a means of survival, like hunting, would it be possible for that person to become a better than average shooter, admiting they had the time and resources to practice.

I am aware some individuals may have knack for some activity or skill or something alike it but shooting, in my understanding, is more about early introduction and constant practice than just inate skill.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] telemaphone@beehaw.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I took a bunch of teenagers shooting last month, and most of them had never picked up a gun before. There were three boys that outshone the others as being much better shots straight away. And funny enough, they were not the boys I would have predicted. So, yes, people can have a knack for it.

That being said, better than average depends on what population of people you're talking about. If you're including all non-experienced shooters, then absolutely, with a little careful practice, most people can become decent shots in a pretty short amount of time.

[–] Semester3383@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If you’re including all non-experienced shooters

Even if you include only gun owners that think they're experienced, it's still easy-ish to be better than average with focused practice. There are a lot of people that think going to the range once every six months and shooting 100 rounds of slow fire makes them good. Meanwhile, the people that are actually good do dryfire drills daily, and shoot thousands of rounds each month.

I'm solidly low-middle when it comes to shooting competitions like local PCSL, local USPSA, Brutality, Gun Run, etc. That probably puts me in the top 5% of gun owners though. (And I absolutely suck at long range shooting; I've done a little, but I don't know my holds, because I've had very limited ability to shoot past 100y. I really struggle past 300y without a spotter, and past 500y it's basically pure luck for me to hit a full-sized steel IPSC target.)