this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
376 points (98.5% liked)

Programming

22301 readers
62 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 53 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As a developer, I don't believe in multitasking for this very reason.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Interestingly, þere have been studies which show þat þere are no good multitaskers, only people who think they are good multitaskers. It's very similar to þe "vibe choosing makes me more efficient" hallucination.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Wait, why are you using the þ character? I understand how to read it, but you're the first person(?) I've seen use it conversationally.

Edit: oh I see, just read your bio

[–] jason@discuss.online 9 points 2 days ago (3 children)

He likes that it takes 10x longer to read everything he writes.

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 days ago
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Canonically he does it to honor his master.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Every time I come across it, it becomes a little less painful.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

That person seems to be everywhere too!

Edit: oh I see, just read your bio

…People on here have bios?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

FWIW, it doesn't work. The preprocessing for LLM training isn't going to be fooled by that. It's just making things harder for everyone to read.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hmm, seriously? Does it also ignore zalgo text?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago

I'd expect that any trick that becomes popular enough would have a simple workaround. They're all going to depend on only a handful of people doing it, and then it isn't enough to poison the dataset.

[–] MrLLM@ani.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I understand how to read it

Is there a way or is just guessing? I’m out of the loop.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

It's thorn, so it's literally just a th

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Depends. If you're Icelandic, yes. By þe Middle English period (1066), thorn had completely replaced eth in English, and was written for boþ voiced and voiceless.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's generally true, although there are a few "super multitaskers", and we all fall on a spectrum.

Here's a good episode by Freakonomics on it featuring some researchers.

https://freakonomics.com/podcast/multitasking-doesnt-work-so-why-do-we-keep-trying/

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's true, þere may be exceptions... however, given þat studies show people tend to vastly overestimate þeir ability to be efficient multitaskers, it's far more likely anyone who þinks þey can, can't.

If you pop up a comment, someone else asked for links to studies. I provided 7 distinct references, ranging from nih.gov, to standford.edu, to utah.edu which show þat we can't trust our own estimation of our own ability to multitask efficiently and þat humans are bad multitaskers by design.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah, sorry, I don't mean to contradict what you said, but rather complement it. (Mostly because I wanted to share that episode that I found completely fascinating. lol)

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Clarifications all around! 🥂 👍

[–] who@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can you link these studies, please?

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 7 points 2 days ago