this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
298 points (92.1% liked)

politics

25300 readers
3427 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The poll indicates support for the more aggressive position Newsom has taken in standing up to Donald Trump, particularly over a plan by Republicans in Texas to redraw their state's congressional seat map in the hopes of winning more seats in midterm elections next year.

The battle to become the 2028 presidential election candidate will likely set the new direction for the Democratic Party as it struggles with net favorability at what one recent poll showed to be a three-year low. Newsom has not formally announced his candidacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

The left is so fractured and infested with idealists that they can't be fucked to vote for someone that is 80% of what they want vs 10% of what they want. That's what this whole thing boils down to. We have two parties. That's it. If we had a system like Germany we may be able to create change. We can't here. Lesser of two evils is the only option.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Lesser of two evils is the only option.

Voting for the lesser of two evils for 40 years got us Trump. So maybe try something else.

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, maybe try non participation like this other guy. You can only live out the fantasy for so long before you have to vote for a less ideal candidate. And trying something else is???? Voting for a different primary candidate? Or you're saying sitting out is trying something else? Either way, the stance is milquetoast.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
  • Please stop bombing kids
  • Please stop backing a genocide
  • Please make it so that Healthcare isn't the leading cause of bankruptcy
  • Please make the rich pay taxes
  • Please stop giving our tax money away to your rich friends
  • Please help with the housing crisis
  • Please stop giving our tax money to the Military/Intelligence agencies
  • Please make education affordable
  • Please give people equal rights
  • Please stop torturing people
  • Please give us an increase in pay

"idealists"

I don't think that word means what you think it means.

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, you're right, better to back the GOP instead.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I never said that. There is an easy way to keep the GOP out: Put up a candidate with policies that the voters want. But the Democrats seem pretty allergic to that.

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

That's literally what you're saying... The vast majority of us agree on the bullet points and are very frustrated by the state of the US system.. but in the face of what we are dealing with, we really don't have the luxury of only voting for the perfect candidate. We know the Democrats suck. We get it. Lame Democrats or Authoritarian Republicans. Terrible options but clearly one is better than the other.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

There are non-capitalist candidates on the ballot, try voting for them.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Agreed. It’s that whole “perfect being the opposite of good” ideology. Every election year, it’s always the same thing- some socio-economic or political event gets them in a rage and they aren’t even aware that by-and-large, it’s the conservatives that are in the shadows, laughing their asses off while fanning the flames.

The fracture their protest causes only helps the right. And their smug arrogance won’t ever lent them see it.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 1 points 17 hours ago

We're aware who is fanning the flames. We also see Democratic politicians holding a match and a can of gasoline, and we're told that it's our fault for asking for something better.