806
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
806 points (97.1% liked)
Progressive Politics
3134 readers
1436 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
On reddit, for my criticism of the Democratic Party, I am often censored on liberal spaces besides r/50501.
I follow the rules always, I cite sources, I am polite, and I am a US citizen. I am not influenced by Russian propaganda (to the best of my knowledge), and I'd like to say I have decent stances; I advocate for nonviolence and human rights, and generally advocate for progress and civility.
The "trolls" (I do my best to always assume good faith) here have nowhere near as much power here on the fediverse as on reddit.
On reddit, once you block someone, it shuts down discussion completely. Users there strategically block after their first rebuttal to prevent any of your responses from showing up and to gain the last word. I often waste time researching and typing a response, only to find out I was blocked and my response is only showing up for me. The only way to get around this is to edit your comments from before they blocked you, and it is very awkward (and usually results in lots of downvotes when you can't properly respond to someone calling you a Russian troll).
If OP blocks you, you get kicked from the thread completely. You can neither see the thread after that point, nor respond to anyone else. Even your comments on the thread are invisible on your user profile (so unless you do voodoo and find the comment permalink, it's difficult to edit your comment with a response).
Mods also abuse automod to trick you into thinking your posts or comments are showing up for others (like setting it to remove everything for a specific user). They do this to avoid accountability when they can't easily explain what rule you broke or when mods censor based on ideological grounds. I also get censored automatically by automod often and find that my posts or comments don't show up randomly - presumably I hit automod filters, but I still worry every single time that my account is shadowbanned.
If automod and the blocking functionality isn't abused, any divergent opinion or perspective gets completely buried by downvotes. Like me pointing out how rigged things are for progressives (it's hard for me to stomach people acting like the Democrats need to move right because progressive policies are "extremely unpopular").
Anyway, moderation has been very fair here to me, I just want others to know that reddit is completely busted for healthy discourse and some of the tricks users and mods use to create echo chambers.
any of the news subreddits, adjacent to the main one is very dicey to talk about. and any politics you have to walk on eggshells. there are ways around a blocked person, but it involves making new account to do it. ive blocked someone, and they decided to use another account and complain on the same thread about being blocked.(this prior to the purges of reddit). if you try to report the person, you could be targeted with a ban for "report abuse"
I was warned for reporting (what I view as) legitimate violations of subreddit rules and calls to violence by reddit themselves. I was conditioned to not report abuse.
Add in reddit actioning accounts for upvoting certain content, and it's easy to see that healthy participation on the website is severely chilled, in addition to the website generally being hostile to discourse.
Aaron Swartz is rolling in his grave, reddit is nothing like what it was founded on.
same here, apparently the politics sub will take it more harshely, what you view is legitmate may not what the mods see. it seems they dont like when you are reporting a comment you did not engage in
It's a lot of energy to invest in a discourse that is being oppositionally refereed. Under better circumstances I'd say it was laudable, and on Lemmy the effort is certainly less wasted, but I'm starting to wonder if maybe the better part of our energies are better spent on in-person political efforts.
I agree - I struggle a lot with my health, but there has to be something I can do in-person. Our direction needs to change as a society.
The problem is that you really can't criticize the DNC without inadvertently endorsing the GOP. It's a fact of life in a two party system.
What are you talking about?
I can criticize the DNC, RNC, Dems, and GOP.
I can endorse the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and their DSA National Convention they just held a week or so ago in Chicago.
You see the political spectrum like this:
Dems >---------------< GOP
I see the political spectrum like this:
Left >--------< Dems >--------< GOP
The Dems get hate from both sides, so they want to collapse that by disrepresenting the Left and absorbing the Right. It will never work out for them
He's too far right to understand anything like this. His alt on piefed.world has defended racist institutions and thinks if you call out liberals doing bad policies, you're a Tankie.
He's a dumbass who thinks he knows better.
I'm supremely happy to see you pissed off tankies getting this mad. May your glorious leader someday have an aneurysm.
No leaders in anarchism, dingus.
You're not fooling anybody, you only oppose western powers.
Fuck Russia and it's imperialist invasions.
Fuck China and it's horrid practices of the Ughyers and the citizens are large.
North Korea is a failed state that makes dystopian novels look like paradise.
Stalin was a horrid person, Mao killed too many with the great leap forward, the Kim Il family dynasty is just a kingdom pretending to be socialist until they literally wrote out any pretending of socialism, yet Tankies still defend them.
I have no issue saying this because I don't idolize things that don't care about me. Can you say anything negative about the things you idolize?
You can say all of that but you're only taking specific steps to further their interests in the USA.
So even when I call them out it's not good enough, good to know.
And you didn't call out anyone when I asked you too. So you're just never going to criticize those you idolize, pot meet kettle.
When you post about volunteering for the DNC and working against the GOP I'll believe you're something other than an autboritarian, despite your history of defending Tankies and berating human rights.
When I have defended Tankies and berating human rights? I'll wait for proof.
I've literally called you out on stripping rights of people on your alt.
You think you're even worth my time? I think every witness should just scroll through your comment history if they're curious.
So that's a "I don't have proof" then, gotcha.
Edit: yep, downvote and move on, got it Blue MAGA.
The most third party senators we've ever had was 4, right before the GOP swept every chamber in 2024 and before that in 1941.
We currently have ZERO third party reps in the House. Not a single one.
If you're going to shit on dems then it is imperative that you shit on the GOP harder because if we turn people away from the DNC there is NOTHING left. We're basically splitting our vote up while the Republicans fall in line.
I agree. That's why all Democrats need to endorse current Independents so they can gain back their power, like Zohran Mamdani in New York and maybe Graham Platner in Maine.
But I've been seeing disappointing behaviors from the Dems with that lately. Not just in New York and Maine, but also in Minnesota with how the Dems revoked their endorsement of democratic socialist Omar Fateh. Pathetic.
Right so splitting the vote isn't enough you want it to split even more so that the GOP gain supermajority. Makes sense.
We need a unified front to fight the fascists in office, and parading out the establishment Dems that caused this all to happen is not a winning strategy.
We need new blood that will draw in new voters. And we need to decide who that new blood is before the end of the year so they can start primarying in January.
Oh that makes sense so I guess we need to split the progressive vote, thanks for explaining it to me. /s
Splitting the vote is the exact opposite of uniting the vote
If you demand the vote be united under a new and different banner than the one which reflects 90% of the same policy stance then you're splitting the vote.
I don't. I recognize that the Democratic party is our best bet to move in a progressive way towards the Left.
Mamdani won the Democratic nomination. He's still a Democratic Socialist of America (DSA). I don't see this any different from the Tea Party within the GOP in the late 2000's. We can have factions within the party, but in those factions we need to find unity.
Establishment Dems are a faction that don't deserve to be party of that unity. They seek to undermine material improvements for the working class while letting the billionaires get away with not paying their fair share.
100% the opposite
Lol the mods removed my apology, like they want us to fight.
Keep thinking like this and we'll have Vance 2028.
That's a convenient stance for people who love everything the DNC does and want to shut down all criticism.
Sure is useful that we can't call out the people we are required to vote for.
Maybe if Democrats didn't unquestionably ship weapons to a state exterminating an occupied people, I'd shut up and fall in line. Maybe.
Congratulations, you and people like you convinced 8 Million DNC voters to stay home in 2024, now Trump is president and a Fox News host with white supremacist tattoos is head of the DoD and pushing for the death or exodus of every single Palestinian, Israel put tanks on the ground in Gaza for the first time in two decades and started bombing Rafah with weapons that the DNC withheld previously. Blood is on your hands.
My impact was nil. Did you not read my post? I get censored and buried.
If you want someone to blame, look within, and tell the Democrats to do the same.
Running a rushed campaign with no substantive policies, tirelessly lying about tirelessly working for a ceasefire, appealing to the right, not holding primaries, pushing a senile, self-proclaimed Zionist (Biden) until the last minute (who supported the genocide unquestionably) surely didn't have anything to do with the loss.
Point is, there are a lot more than 8 million untapped voters. 1/3 of the country doesn't vote. Encourage Democrats to tap into that demographic, and pressure genocidal states just a little bit. It'd go a long way.
No, you don't understand. Anyone who even thought something approaching an unkind thought toward netanyahu singlehandedly threw out every vote cast for harris.
If that helps you sleep at night.
Your source for that article cites the Israeli officials, who btw endorsed Trump.
Nine top Biden officials admit that there was no pressure.
https://i.redd.it/itubfj2n5oxe1.png
Again, that image quotes the exact same Israeli, and there is no link to any article or anything by this Israeli news channel from there so...
You also have top Biden officials making the opposite claim that they did try everything, short of full withdrawal of support which was never going to happen because Israel is an irreplaceable asset to the US Military in the region, to bring about a ceasefire and that Netanyahu was dragging it out for the US Elections. There are quotes from staffers that old man Biden would swear at Netanyahu over the phone. There is a quote from Trump that Biden was withholding shipments of large bombs that were already paid for, shipments that Trump immediately pushed through.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-aides-finally-reveal-who-really-ran-the-country-as-biden-slid-into-mental-incompetence/ar-AA1waZeH
And aides reveal that Biden essentially wasn't running the country, but his administration sure shipped out a lot of bombs to support the war against women and children.
Regardless, I already know that you and I will likely not see eye to eye from past observance of your postings, and that's fine. You can imagine blood on my hands, and that's also fine. I did not mention the issue overseas directly ~~once~~ more than a handful of times in my postings until after the election, because I wanted to believe the Biden administration would shift after the tens of thousands of civilian deaths.
Bottom line, do you think the Democratic party should continue to be coddled, with all criticism silenced, while they have no winning strategy and even major donors have lost confidence?
There appear to be zero references of Palestine, Israel, or Netanyahu in that article. You've lost the argument so now you're just insulting the opposition?
You really don't get it. It doesn't matter how bad the DNC is, you're never going to accomplish anything by pointing all of that out, because the only alternative is the GOP and they are a thousand times worse in every regard you claim to care about.
Also, you claim they've lost donors, but they set records for campaign contributions in 2024.
...it'll never be bad enough for you.
The DNC could be a 1:1 copy of Trump and they'd still defend them.
They converge on that with every election.
Literally as Newsom is being basically appointed without consulting the public. And he's a right winger form 2008.
Where is the insult? We were quoting Biden officials, I thought it relevant to link that in response to you mentioning Biden swearing on the phone, which likely had zero impact. Biden wasn't fit for office or reelection, and the reason the Democrats lost is because he held on until the last minute, making a primary impossible. In no world would Kamala have won under the circumstances with her policies.
I'm not interested in winning arguments regarding critical subjects like this, but rather trying to get to the heart of your insistence to support a system that is blind and unwilling to represent its populace, who pay for the bombs that have killed many innocents.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/18/dnc-fundraising-donor-problems-midterms-00512473
The DNC has lost major donors.
Edit: And I did lie, not purposely, but alas. I mentioned the genocide twice or thrice prior to the election, with one instance garnering me one internet point and another losing me one. I remember doing my best to hold my tongue. I convinced no one to stay home as far as I am concerned, and even if I did somehow, that was their decision.