this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
903 points (96.8% liked)

memes

16949 readers
3905 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(Source: TikTok video)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If they managed where luggage was stored in the overhead, they could reduce it 10 fold. The whole wait is because people need to go back x rows past people standing to get their luggage. Even if they made everyone sit and deboard in zones it could be way faster.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 15 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

The luggage problem has only got worse and worse over the past decade, and by the airlines' own making. Carriers all started trying to make extra cash by charging for checked luggage, which incentivises people to take carry-on only, up to the maximum size and quantity of carry-on they are permitted.

If bags could be checked for free and people took only an under-seat carry-on for the things they need in flight it wouldn't be a problem, but we know that's never going to happen.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

If bags could be checked for free

I'm skeptical. I fly quite often and it is normal for gate agents to openly beg people to gate check their bags (for free) and be faced by a crowd of dead eyed travelers unwilling to part with their max size carry on roller luggage.

I wouldn't discount passengers irrationally hanging onto their luggage for some sense of control.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

Agreed it’s a combo of higher seat density and way more checked bags.

I swear in the 90s getting off a plane felt way quicker.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is underallocated overhead space. You give us maximum dimensions, and you know the number of seats. Fucking have sufficient overhead space.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The amount of space is the amount of space. You can't create more, because it's literally constrained by the roof of the plane. It's already maxed out.

The only thing they could do to make sure there was "enough space" is to have less tightly packrd seats and carry less people, which again they aren't going to do for the obvious reason - profit.

Or - reduce the max carry on baggage dimensions, which I'm sure people would equally complain about. And would make them look worse against other airlines which "allow" bigger bags, despite there not being enough space to put them!

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 7 points 23 hours ago

It's this. Stay the fuck down until your row is clearing.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

There is a faster method of deplaning. Inside-out is faster. All the aisle seats get their stuff and get off. Then middle, then window

Unfortunately it was never implemented because it makes it difficult to charge extra for higher class zones. It's also very difficult to get people to actually do it

[–] Patches@ttrpg.network 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Ah yes, the most human deboarding method. Children deboarding on their own. Families separated.

Hundreds of people trying to reunite at the gate all simultaneously.

That won't cause any downstream issues.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago

It would also split up people who are travelling together, so there's no way it's happening.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 22 hours ago

I think they should only let you put it in the overhead if it's over your seat. It's full? Tough shit. Check it.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 hours ago

That would slow down boarding exponentially. It just takes one or two assholes to need to have flight attendants stationed throughout the entire cabin making sure people use their bins.

Rule of thumb: if you are anything past the first peasant boarding group, look ahead. If things look crowded? Find the first mostly empty bin and just put your bag up there so that you can grab it on your way out. Otherwise you are gambling that there will be an opening closer to where you actually sit which inevitably is five rows behind you.

And that (and lounge access and not needing to manage miles for status) is why I ended up just getting the fancy credit card for my airline group of choice. Priority boarding means it doesn't matter where I sit: I have "my" bin.