this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
2053 points (99.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

9017 readers
3025 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 197 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We really really need an open OS for mobile phones that is actually competitive with commercial offerings.

[–] troed@fedia.io 133 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I don't think the OS is the problem - it's that some of the critical service/apps people rely on (government ID, banking) only exist for the closed systems. Third party OS's try to "solve" it through various container approaches running the official apps, but since they see that as a security problem it's not something you can fully trust to be working at all times.

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's the only reason I'm still on android. If I install a different OS I won't be able to login to do anything government related. I won't even be able to pay with my credit card online. I could get a physical code device from the government, but I'm not gonna lie, I really like the ease of access of having an app for that stuff, instead of a seperate device I have to have on me at all times.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I will probably have to go the route of two phones soon. One for my stuff and communicating with friends and family, and one (maybe one of the cheaper iphones?) for all the "required" apps.

Funny enough, you tend to see quite some people in China do this. I wonder why.

[–] gens@programming.dev 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

All those "apps" are websites. You could say NFC is special, but so is gps.

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 41 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Exactly. Locking basic services behind apps should be illegal. Services must be accessible to everyone.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

same goes for the weather app ...

(context: some years ago they locked the publicly-funded german weather service's API, so common people can't access it anymore. you need to use a spam-ridden app to access it now.)

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At the very least you can still pay a small one-time fee for the DWD WarnWetter app (or enter a code for firefighters).

Best 3€ I've ever spent purely out of spite, even if the reason behind it is complete BS.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

They sometimes hand out codes "to be used only by firefighters and paramedics, wink wink".

[–] qqq@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yea.. Like some of those parking applications. Ugh.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

To be fair, a lot of those depend on some client side trust. Which is conceptually stupid, but it is the way it is.

[–] qqq@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think they're both pretty big problems. An open OS and hardware that supports it seems to be a huge hurdle, but at least there is a clear vision of how to solve it. The problem you bring up though... It seems like we've almost gone too far at this point and it's gonna be really hard to put the cat back in the bag. It seems like something we need to solve with legislation potentially?

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The people writing the legislation are the same people who don't see a problem with a government-furnished app using Play Integrity

[–] qqq@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes there is a general ignorance to this problem among law makers, in my country at least, as well as a bit of regulatory capture with respect to tech in general. The boogie man of "security" is also a very persuasive concept for a lot of people. This is not a problem that will be solved easily.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

This. Alternative OS exist: Ubuntu Touch, postmarketOS, SailfishOS, just to name a few.

What is missing are the apps people want. And those include mostly commercial apps, where the developers need to weigh dev hours vs profits, and decide to only target the big two for obvious reasons. That is the key problem.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doesn’t android allow this?

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's what the OP is referring to: Google just announced they will do their best to kill off sideloading.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I had no idea. Damn…

[–] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

didn't apple just get forced to enable side loading in the EU due to the DMA?

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah, but I think they implemented the same restrictions Google is planning, so I'm not very helpful that EU is gonna stop Google...