this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
165 points (96.1% liked)

News

31865 readers
2875 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 78 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The reaction has been absurd, but their new logo was definitely awful.

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Kinda wish the public had a similar outrage when Fruit of the Loom modernized their logo in 2000, lol

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

I just wish they didn't try to gaslight humanity into believing there was never a cornucopia

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 9 points 23 hours ago

I'm more upset about Mr Pringle.

Lost not only his hair, but the twinkle in his eye, poor chap.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I don't think that the old logo is great either, and the update did improve on technical aspects. You don't want to have all that small text, for example. And generally, simpler logos are preferable.

But...their shtick is a rustic feel. Whatever you can say about the original logo, it did evoke that. I have a hard time seeing the new one doing that.

EDIT: I also think that this compares favorably to another controversial recent rebrand: Musk rebranding Twitter, which was generally seen as not a good idea; Twitter already had a strong brand identity. People weren't happy and Musk went right ahead with it regardless. At Cracker Barrel, the initial response was "calm down, it'll be okay", but they were willing to second-guess themselves, even though I expect that there were people there who were invested in the rebrand.

EDIT2: They'd also done smaller, more incremental changes to the logo in the past, because the "Old Country Store" text had had its typeface changed at some point in the past.

EDIT3: Here's a more-comprehensive history:

https://dwglogo.com/cracker-barrel-logo/

1000009253

[–] mememuseum@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

If they'd just textured the background shape to actually look like a barrel it would be pretty good actually.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

According to another site, the logo was 1977, not 1997. Which tracks with another article mentioning a marketing person coming up with the design in the 70s

[–] errer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I do find it amusing that the “classic” logo everyone is pining for is from the “ancient” year of 1997…

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 11 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Tbf as weird as it sounds, ‘97 is vintage now

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

Officially 28 years ago

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 6 points 21 hours ago

I hate you for pointing that out.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Counts on hands... Oh yeah, it's over 10 years now isn't it?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

I think there's a mistake, other sources say 1977 instead of 1997..

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

On the long drive to and from vacation last week I noticed the 2024-25 picture used a lot and I thought wait they already have a version without the other stuff and it looks fine so why the hell are they changing it again when its perfectly fine the way it is? My biggest complaint of the newest one was just that it featured no border. It already looked weird, but without that border, it just didn't work at all.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 18 hours ago

It was fine, Jesus Christ

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How was it awful?

Could you tell me what the heck this yellow blob shape is supposed to be?

From a purely graphic design perspective, the classic logo is too busy and doesn't scale well. The only thing it has going for it is the weirdness of the shape and the distinct color combination. It's technically a really bad logo. You may not prefer the new logo but, technically, it's a whole lot better. It's far more adaptable to newer platforms while stilling being recognizable. Now, as far as being an effective representation of the brand and if that's a corporate concern, I don't know that I can comment on that.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In another post about this, someone posted a bunch of other fast food logos, and they all looked very much the same, especially in silhouette. They're all just a same-y blend of mediocrity, whereas the existing logo was at least unique.

McDonald's probably has the best and most distinctive logo out of anyone.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 18 hours ago
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The yellow blob is a pinto bean. :)

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought it was some splooge.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The barrel ain’t just full of crackers

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yellow blob is obviously a speech bubble.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Its not a speech bubble, its what the awful food will look like coming out on the other end of the tunnel

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

It's somebody who sees the white guy and a barrel and said them two together.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today -2 points 1 day ago

100%, right here.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who gives a fuck? Let's focus on the fascist takeover happening in every city in the country, and the billionaires almost completely winning the war on the populace.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jesus, we're allowed to think about other things every so often, it doesn't have to be US politics 24/7

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I mean, the headline literally talks about conservative snowflakes, it's kind of related