this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
157 points (95.9% liked)

News

31865 readers
3141 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago

The backlash from the racist bigots you mean. Where else are they going to go after church to be mean to the wait staff

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 3 points 4 hours ago

Wait a minute. The logo is literally a cracker and a barrel 🤣. I'm surprised conservatives are ok being made fun of.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Lol.

Boomer oriented company chooses to stay in business for a few more years until boomers are all gone.

I went into a Cracker Barrel once. 90% elderly.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Who gives a shit about a logo??? Companies can do whatever the hell they want with their logos so shut up about it and start asking: WHERE'S THE EPSTEIN FILES???

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

Probably not at Cracker Barrel, but I suppose anything's possible.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago

Were it not for the whiny fucking losers and their incessant bitching and moaning over everything, I wouldn't have know nor cared.

I still don't care.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago
[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 23 points 14 hours ago

No bigger snowflake than a MAGAt.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 78 points 19 hours ago
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 30 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not conservative in the slightest and I thought the redesign was completely ass.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Yes, but did you go unhinged calling it "woke"? The logo was a poor fit and I could get behind it, but so many MAGAs losing it over calling a lame logo "woke"....

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 16 points 19 hours ago

The whole restaurant is complete ass.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 76 points 1 day ago (17 children)

The reaction has been absurd, but their new logo was definitely awful.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago

It was fine, Jesus Christ

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Kinda wish the public had a similar outrage when Fruit of the Loom modernized their logo in 2000, lol

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I just wish they didn't try to gaslight humanity into believing there was never a cornucopia

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago

I'm more upset about Mr Pringle.

Lost not only his hair, but the twinkle in his eye, poor chap.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I don't think that the old logo is great either, and the update did improve on technical aspects. You don't want to have all that small text, for example. And generally, simpler logos are preferable.

But...their shtick is a rustic feel. Whatever you can say about the original logo, it did evoke that. I have a hard time seeing the new one doing that.

EDIT: I also think that this compares favorably to another controversial recent rebrand: Musk rebranding Twitter, which was generally seen as not a good idea; Twitter already had a strong brand identity. People weren't happy and Musk went right ahead with it regardless. At Cracker Barrel, the initial response was "calm down, it'll be okay", but they were willing to second-guess themselves, even though I expect that there were people there who were invested in the rebrand.

EDIT2: They'd also done smaller, more incremental changes to the logo in the past, because the "Old Country Store" text had had its typeface changed at some point in the past.

EDIT3: Here's a more-comprehensive history:

https://dwglogo.com/cracker-barrel-logo/

1000009253

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

According to another site, the logo was 1977, not 1997. Which tracks with another article mentioning a marketing person coming up with the design in the 70s

[–] errer@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I do find it amusing that the “classic” logo everyone is pining for is from the “ancient” year of 1997…

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 10 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Tbf as weird as it sounds, ‘97 is vintage now

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 5 points 14 hours ago

I hate you for pointing that out.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Counts on hands... Oh yeah, it's over 10 years now isn't it?

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

I think there's a mistake, other sources say 1977 instead of 1997..

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 34 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

Thank god! Now can we get back to the important issues? How's that WAR ON CHRISTMAS going?

[–] Kiernian@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The war on Christmas CANNOT END until Christmas ceases its illegal occupation of November.

We are once again calling on the Claus regime to return to their side of the borders outlined in the Black Friday agreement.

November? I think you forgot to include September and October.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

I've already fired my first salvo. By now I would have had at least three or four gifts already purchased and ready for the Christmas season. I haven't even bothered. And I won't. It's going to be a lean Christmas and it's going to hurt the capitalist assholes who are fucking up our country.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I've never seen people freak out so hard over a LOGO change. Jesus, it's not like they changed the typeface to Comic Sans or Papyrus or some shit!

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Nothing wrong with Comic Sans. It’s highly readable for many people.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Because everything in the United States has been turned into "us vs them" crap.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Was it really conservative backlash? I don't think anyone liked it, lol.

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Non-conservatives give a shit about cracker barrel?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

The general reaction may have been negative, but the conservatives went unhinged accusing the new logo of being "woke"

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The news sells better and is more engaging when you put it is conservative backslash instead of just overall negative reaction

[–] Remoed 3 points 14 hours ago

Especially on this platform

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 9 points 20 hours ago

Complained about the redesign, isn't Conservative How dare you insult me like this? I am an American and I will not stand for being called a Nazi.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 19 points 23 hours ago

Called it. They new coke'd that shit.

load more comments
view more: next ›