this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2025
266 points (99.3% liked)

Android

31662 readers
654 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Replaced "Restrictions" in place of the word "Ban"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Source for this ban claim?

I know there is a ban on not being able to install unsigned apps, but it won't limit apps to only Google Play apps.

Please, while the whole situation is BS, adding complete misinformation to the mix isn't going to help.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It never fails to amuse me how confidently wrong some people can be when they don't even read what they link to.

Because, you know, if you did read that link, you'd know how wrong you were.

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

What's wrong about:

Android will require all apps to be registered by verified developers

we're working on a separate type of Android Developer Console account

I don't want to suck Google's dick and create a Google account to send my applications to people who want to sideload them.

You were confidently wrong about me being a regular user. Nice try though.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You literally pointed out that sideloading will still be available, which is what this is about. It's not about if developers need to be registered, that's its own issue with is separate own issue. Blocking sideloading means no more 3rd party stores, which will still be very much allowed even in these ruling.

And when did I say anything about you being any type of user, regular or otherwise? And what does that have to do with anything about this false claim that sideloading will be banned?

Did you reply to the wrong comment? Or are you taking confidently wrong to a whole new level?

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sideloading with a central authority is not sideloading.

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Oh, of course. When you get trapped in your confidently wrong BS, you move the goal post.

The whole thread is about supposedly not being able to install beyond the Google Play Store, its literallyin the posts title. Trying to rewrite what "sideloading" is now isn't helping you're argument.