this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
66 points (76.6% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1453 readers
304 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When having to admit their fault the moderator started looking for arbitrary reasons to ban me. Such as not using the exact terminology of the Amnesty report. Which does not call it genocide.


The moderator is also watching user votes, and calling out people not voting with him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I was expecting this post, thank you.

To start, you were engaging in revisionism and apologia.

Apologia — (Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present.

I'm fine if you have issues with genocide only being referenced three times in the amnesty report, but you also vehemently denied human rights abuses and the imperialism of current-day China, even arguing for a supportive imperialism, which there is no such thing. The Uyghurs are detained based on ethnicity, which is mentioned numerous times throughout the report -- you denied this.

Your ban is temporary, 24 hours. All bans on meanwhileongrad are temporary and are always given after warnings.


This community



You're also being disingenuous; dbo is not just 'another' user. They are the moderator of this snark community (and admin of the instance), which regularly interrogates moderator decisions or behaviour without actually caring if the user has violated the rules. This thread is an example of this. I knew you'd make this post because I've dealt with so many Tankies such as yourself that it's become all very predictable

Which brings me to why I originally pinged db0 about how they vote. This is a perfect example of why I'm specifically holding this community and dbo to this special standard, or rather, the standards they hold others to. The OP, @IndustryStandard@lemmy.world, explicitly violated the rules despite being warned and despite many chances to explain their reasoning, so they received a ban (all bans are temporary on meanwhileongrad). Yet, despite this ban being justified, within the rules, and having received multiple warnings and chances, I am still a "Power-tripping bastard"-not on the basis of my moderation, but rather my views.

To illustrate this, I pinged db0 about their support for Tankies, much as this community pings moderators as to interrogate their personal views instead of the reasoning for the bans. You even conveniently left out the reasoning for why I originally pinged him; that's bad form, and you're being disingenuous again.


See, this community regularly interferes with the posts linked. Here are examples from across the thread:



And when moderators come in to give answers for the bans, they're still attacked. I was pinged to explain why PugJesus messed up, which I did and fixed the mistake, but I was still attacked.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/42749040

In this thread, no one actually goes into what rules were broken and why they were banned. (Not that I agree with @PugJesus@lemmy.world, I don't agree with their moderation and have since removed them as Mod)

https://sh.itjust.works/post/42612816

Pug doesn't have a chance to explain their reasoning because the moderators here, specifically db0, regularly bans people and makes up rules.

"shut the fuck up liberal"

nice. imagine this community's rage if "shut the fuck up tankie" appeared in modlog... owait, it did with Pug and this community predictably raised a fit about it... But silence when it comes to db0's moderation.

Do admins have to be “apolitical” opinionless angels? @irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com

I answered No. But why do you, db0, and this community expect the same of moderators?

I also explained that !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works is constantly brigaded and attacked as it is the only community that stands against Tankies across Lemmy and holds the developers of Lemmy accountable for their extremist views. We constantly encounter bots, spammers, alt accounts, trolls, and doxxers, so I need to be vigilant by regularly checking who's interfering and from where.

However, I also regularly see members from this instance and from this community voting on comments and posts that are critical of tankies. When this is coming from the same users and community, that's rather concerning.

To quote db0,

Maybe you should start holding your community to a higher standard -- It's being captured by tankies. And I'm sure you know the history of how communists treat anarchists lol

Because nothing says anarchy as much as "shut the fuck up liberal"

I don't expect to reason with anyone from this instance or this community, but hopefully, those unfamiliar with this community, instance, and Tankies as a whole will appreciate the efforts.

thank you sincerely, this was a rare opportunity, shoutout to @blaze@lemmy.zip

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I voted in those threads long before I knew this thread existed.

No. But why do you, db0, and this community expect the same of moderators?

I don't really, where did I say that?

I pinged db0 about their support for Tankies

Support for tankies being a downvote on a post?

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Can you explain yourself doing genocide propaganda for Israel? https://lemmy.world/comment/19117021

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

On a slightly unrelated note: I had issues with the d0 admins not enforcing their “disengage” rule when a user was harassing me on their instance after I asked them to politely to stop engaging.

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Huh, really? Did you report the person refusing to disengage?

I check my reports all the time, i didn't see it. If so, sorry about that

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes however no action was taken. I had to block them oh well.

I appreciate the response ;)

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Mind telling the admins who it was so they can moderate them for future rule breaking?

Edit: so that's a no, you just wanted to stir shit.

I had flatworm ban me for two weeks for a first offence against the disengagement rule and I’ve never seen that before.

It felt personal.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What's with these comments you've made on several occasions about having been a longtime member of voat and other neo-nazi websites? Why is a moderator of a comm visiting a neo-nazi website at all? Since you're so keen on starting shit, would you like to talk about that at all?

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because I find extremists immensely interesting and have interacted with many of them, ranging from Christian fundamentalists to neo-nazis, to jihadists, to libertarians, to anti-vaxxers, to tankies. I like to challenge their views, and it's also educational how these groups operate and how individuals fall into extremism.

I ended up getting banned from Voat to no surprise, which happened within days of voat opening. A year or two later, I made another account to see how the site was going, finding it was just one guy who spends the entirety of the day rambling to himself in the open chat client.

I don't think these sites are around any longer and I expect lemmy to go down the same route soon.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because I find extremists immensely interesting

thank you, that will be all.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you not like that answer? Or are you implying I am one of them, or at least empathetic?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't need to imply that, liberals have a long history of working closely with nazis. that fact that you enjoy hanging out with them tells us everything we need to know about your character.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Communists also have a long history of working closely with nazis, such as Stalin invading Poland along with Nazi Germany.

Nor have I said that I enjoy hanging out with extremists. Nor am I a liberal. Please don't make such assumptions about me, and instead maybe directly ask me for my views or for me to clarify?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Communists also have a long history of working closely with nazis, such as Stalin invading Poland along with Nazi Germany.

yeah, but we're not talking about communists, amigo. we're talking about you, and how much you seem to hang around nazis. there's this little thing called "personal responsibility", which posits that Stalin doesn't have shit to do with you being interested in neo-nazi websites.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm afraid you don't understand my point.

My point is that you hold me accountable, falsely labelling me as a Nazi because I have interacted with extremists in the past. You hold liberals accountable for also collaborating with nazis, then surely you must also hold Stalin to this same level of accountability.

I also already explained my reasoning and that I obviously don't agree with such extremists, so why are you still calling me a nazi?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

then surely you must also hold Stalin to this same level of accountability.

https://anarchist.nexus/post/83953
I do. you probably picked the worst time possible to try that argument.

and I'm still calling you a nazi because you hang out with nazis.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can I call you a rapist for supporting Hamas?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you can call me whatever you want, just don't expect me to be worried about what someone who spread zionist propaganda is saying.

so when did this fascination with hanging out with nazis begin? did you have a bad experience with a person of color as a child? maybe hanged out on 4chan as a teen?

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I personally wouldn't be okay with people calling me a rapist, just as I'm not okay with being called a nazi. You're kinda like this guy.

But yes, I became interested in extremists during the 2016 election and the emergence of neo-nazis into public spaces. I took note of the dog whistles they use and how easy it is to radicalise moderate or unknowing people. I found it disgusting how you can manipulate the truth and have so much hatred and a love for violence. It just didn't, and still doesn't, make sense for why someone would want to kill others for their views.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This guy is you. He is fan of nazi, you are fan of zionism

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I personally wouldn't be okay with people calling me a rapist

I don't concern myself with what people on the internet think of me.

But yes, I became interested in extremists during the 2016 election

now see, that wasn't so hard. thank you for finally getting around to answering my question.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's worth noting that I'm Australian. I have zero say in the shitshow that is the US. Again, what's the point of this? It doesn't make me look bad

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I suppose that’s up to how each person interprets what you’ve said, isn’t it?

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I've actively disavowed any atrocities and succinctly explained my views, answering all your questions. You said you're okay with Hamas and rape.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rape? Oh no, I don’t support rape. I believe hamas should limit their actions to killing the oppressors.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But you do acknowledge that rapes occurred?

What about the killing of innocent civilians?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I acknowledge Israel claims they did. They haven’t allowed any independent investigation into it.

As for the killing of innocents, there are no Israelis that are innocent of taking advantage of the genocide, any more than there are Americans or russians innocent of imperialism.

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The UN appears to believe Israel, does that change your mind at all that they occurred?

You're supportive of the 7th of October massacres?

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The UN appears to believe Israel, does that change your mind at all that they occurred?

as soon as Israel allows independent war crimes investigators into both Israel and the occupied territories, I would be more than happy to change my mind based on any evidence-backed findings the may present.

You're supportive of the 7th of October massacres?

the only good fascist is a dead one. any other obvious questions?

[–] goat@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 week ago

Only good Hamas is a dead one