this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
218 points (99.5% liked)

News

32020 readers
2807 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, for sure. I always buy Toyota. I have never ever had anything go wrong with them. I once said to replace an air conditioner, but that was after living in Arizona and driving it for a decade with the air conditioning full blast the entire time.

Although, I am a bit disappointed that Toyota is not embracing electric.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Although, I am a bit disappointed that Toyota is not embracing electric.

The reason they're not, is the same reason they're so reliable. The Japanese auto manufacturers, with some exceptions, are super conservative. They keep making what's worked for them before, just with incremental changes. The Germans will, for a similar amount of money, give you better suspension in terms of comfort AND sport, more performance, better fuel economy. The Japanese will make a car that you can neglect and it keeps on truckin'. It's true in basically every market segment. It's doubly true in Europe because here we get more German diesels, but the Japanese barely make any, and the ones they do make, suck. All of Estonia drives diesels pretty much, but everyone who knows anything about Subarus would rather pay extra in fuel consumption than get their diesel... Because it splits crankshafts.

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Well, they are focusing on hydrogen because they can produce that in Japan and not be reliant on another country—which is smart, geopolitically. They’re also a bit like Apple in the sense that they don’t jump into things first. As you said, conservative. Battery technology is still pretty shit. Battery technology needs to advance significantly, but it isn’t because we have plenty of oil (haha, until we die from climate change)

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Battery technology is ridiculously good at this point compared to 20 years ago or even 10 years ago tbh. The entire time they were fidgeting with their hybrids, they could've been using that time to developer newer and better battery technologies too. There are several new non-Japanese EVs out there whose range doesn't make me anxious, that I would consider for my next daily driver if I wasn't broke as fuck since 2024 because of... well, long story, let's skip that lol. Or I could get a super depreciated 4 year old uber expensive EV with 4 years left on the battery warranty for fairly little money. Either way, if I was looking at new or lightly vehicles, EVs are now actually competitive.

They can also produce electricity in Japan. Maybe not batteries, but then getting the whole supply chain for the cars from within Japan is unrealistic anyway. They make their own steel, but the iron ore and coal are imported. Plus of course recycled steel is used too, but that comes from all over the world.

What's more, Tesla realized you need to start with high-margin luxury cars (Model S - let's ignore for now the original Roadster which was more of a tech demo made by awesome people pre-Musk), Mercedes realized you need to start with big expensive cars (EQC crossover SUV first, then EQS luxury sedan and then a bunch of smaller ones), Audi realized you need to start with big expensive cars (E-Tron crossover SUV, E-Tron sports/GT car, then also Porsche Taycan within the same corporation)... But Lexus isn't making a big practical electric SUV, nor an electric luxury car. The RZ is okay-sized, but it's a hatchback on stilts, front wheel drive in the lower spec models... Which are already pretty expensive. And because of the rear slope, the trunk loses half its space. Where's the electric LS luxury sedan? Electric GX equivalent for something with a good amount of actual cargo space? The LS in particular would do good as electric because it costs enough that they can afford to put in some adaptive air suspension so you wouldn't feel the weight as much. Plus a moderately sporty luxury sedan with a low center of gravity would be a nice driving experience to get journalists to start hyping up their EVs.

Since batteries are expensive for now, it's best to start electrifying the expensive part of your fleet. It's easier to hide the cost into those. I don't want a hatchback on stilts with front wheel drive and little cargo space for 60 thousand euros before options. If I add just 12k more, I get into a BMW i4 which I'm not fond of the styling of, but at least it doesn't try to pretend it's an SUV that it really isn't. Or the Volvo ES90, which is bigger than the i4.

Now where I do somewhat agree there's a shortcoming in EV tech though: Battery cost. They're still very expensive to replace, and there's no guarantee they'll last 15 to 20 years like most ICE vehicles do. There needs to be EU legislation for repairability since nobody else is going to do it in the current political climate. I'm not going to repair one myself because I don't like playing with anything over 12 volts, but a qualified independent shop should be able to rebalance the cells of a battery, and replace individual cells ideally.

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 1 points 9 hours ago

Battery tech being better than 20 years ago doesn’t mean it’s good. It’s just means it’s better than it was.