Interviews have always been a crappy way to determine candidate quality. Eventually people started to realize this, but then their idea was just 'what if we did the same thing, but twice?'

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

'what if we did the same thing, but twice?'

That's just a perfect way to describe it.

[–] mogranja@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 2 days ago

Like multi-pass encoding

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's like disposable razors... Just keep adding blades

[–] Sunsofold 1 points 2 days ago

Say hello to my new recruiting firm. We don't just do 1 interview, like some caveman from the 50s. We don't do one extra 'safety' interview, like some loser from the 60s. Say hello to Schlickette, the only recruiting agency to do a full 24 hours of randomly interspersed interviews. It'll make your company profitable and women throw themselves at you. Sign up now!