this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
652 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

74994 readers
3083 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For months, Google has maintained that the web is “thriving,” AI isn’t tanking traffic, and its search engine is sending people to a wider variety of websites than ever. But in a court filing from last week, Google admitted that “the open web is already in rapid decline” (with regard to advertising, kinda-sorta)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fuzzywombat@lemmy.world 82 points 2 days ago (4 children)

We really need to change the mindset about what the internet experience should be. I think everyone got too used to the idea of centralized services like Google search, Github, Discord, Twitter, reddit, and etc. and that didn't turn out well. We need to go back to federated protocol based system instead. Let's go back to the decentralized federated architecture of email, web, irc where no one corporate entity is the sole owner of said service. I think Lemmy and Mastodon are good start but we have to start replace things like Google search, Github, and Discord with decentralized counterparts. We have to learn from our past mistakes and start reconstructing a better internet infrastructure one piece at a time. It will take lot of effort and patience but it's really the only way out of the mess we put ourselves into by being addicted to simplicity of centralized corporate controlled systems.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

The cat is out of the bag and long gone.

People got used to the simplicity of centralized services, and corpos made great efforts to make everything 1-click.

So when the average users need to do more than 1-click, they won't use the software.

It would help if anti-trust laws were applied and these mega-corpos got broken in a thousand pieces. Centralized monolith services would have a harder time to thrive and give space to federation/decentralization.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

From my perspective that seems to be happening. I feel like there's a rift between the websites I use for work and the ones I use on my own time. I realize that for most people on the internet, the big central platforms are the internet--I'm not trying to universalize my perspective.

It's just that I remember when computers and the internet itself were niche and business was still barely aware of its potential, so this kind of feels familiar: You've got biz churning away in the mainstream, unaware of another culture that's growing up, outside of their malls and parking lots.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Prior to GitHub, everyone just hosted their own Git repositories. The nature of Git is pretty decentralised. And Linux kernel development still uses old-fashioned mailing lists for development co-ordination, rather than something like GitHub. I have heard before someone say the difference between Git and GitHub is similar to the difference between porn and Pornhub.

Prior to Discord, there was IRC.

[–] netuno@lemmy.cif.su 13 points 1 day ago

the difference between Git and GitHub is similar to the difference between porn and Pornhub.

🤣

I hope forgejo's federation efforts come along. Being able to host projects on my own instance, yet receive contributions without having to allow people to register on my instance, would give me the push to completely abandon Github.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

I worked at a place that had self-hosted git and IRC for internal messaging. Was great!

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

IRC is still there. The user numbers just aren't that great anymore 😒 I fucking hate discord and what it did and how it took over. And also, of course, murican.

[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hate that everyone fucking uses discord for everything, discord when I'm using it is strictly to game and for online game related activities.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

People are just clueless and lazy, and take the easiest way "that everyone else does too". And here we are. Recently had to join one...and was asked for a phone number before being allowed to enter. Lol. Yeah sure. Guess I won't join then 😐

[–] TheGreenWizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lots of "muricans" hate discord too

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Sure sure, you're not all idiots. Wasn't meant this way. Just that, on top of being shit, being murican is another no-go for an app.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This makes me think that a big part of the solution is some sort of very low barrier to entry guide or product for self-hosting. Like something even a non-technical person can do. Imagine if it became the norm to have a little always-on device that serves up your personal website, instead of social media accounts...

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Considering that many don't even know anymore what a website actually is, or domains (especially TLDs that are not .com or )...

Also take into account that people are lazy (not meant condescending). Using the major shit is easy, "everyone else does too!" and technologically challenged people can use it.

Even IF selfhosted XYZ would be as easy as downloading something (it already starts to be "too complicated" for many) and executing it, it probably wouldn't happen.

I, personally, fear for the future of the web. I've seen the peak of the web and its constant accelerated decline since.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I know more than a few people fitting that description. But I do believe things can turn around. It's less likely to make converts of people who already have that mentality, but things can resurge among new people and I think there's a real movement there with tech literacy.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

I sure hope so, yet am not as optimistic as you 😑

[–] eronth@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I love the idea, but until stuff simplifies significantly that's simply not happening. I'm a moderately technical person and all the self hosting options are such a chore. Even simply looking up info about them can sometimes be harder than installing and starting the centralized option.

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

We need a startup to just make and try to sorta standardize a mini pc product pre-installed with a proxmox-like setup with an easy web interface and self-hosted solutions pre installed. 5-10 apps for main internet service needs like email, social media, content hosting/publishing and personal media libraries.

Give it a cute name like "Web-Pal", keep it open and Customizable for powerusers, watch the internet become a better place while you're the household name for devices that are as essential as a router.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Great idea. From a nerd 😁

But who do you think would be the target demographic? Critical users, that don't want to use major crap but are also not suited for doing it all by themselves, either due to skill, time, money or a combination thereof?

I wouldn't think that group is significantly large. And definitely not large enough to seriously put a dent in the major crap apps.

Better than nothing, but probably not worth investing in such a project. Sadly so, I might add.

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Platforms keep getting shittier and more exploitative, while government thirst for control with things like Chat Control, OSA and whatever the US is doing.

The more we see of that the easier it becomes to market a "your internet services in a box" to a layman.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

But first they have to care. The amount of people who don't care for e.g. privacy - even if explained in detail - is flabbergasting. Even today I heard two times "why? I have nothing to hide" or "but WhatsApp is superior!"

I think this is a really good idea. A baby server for every privacy concerned house. Make it simple enough that customizing software features is like putting together Legos, but leave in the potential for complexity as some users grow.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

If you could sell this for $500 or less you have yourself a customer

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly my thinking. You could even have some sort of containerized environment so that people can easily just download and run containerized apps for various things. A podman image for your music server, for your photo hosting... almost like apps but less proprietary and less closed source

[–] eldebryn@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Yup. I really wish we had an open source alternative to proxmox that used containers under the hood. Would make customizing and mounting external volumes much easier too.

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know how this will help during World War III when billions of people will die.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Seriously? WTF? We're talking current reality here, we can't do anything to start or stop war, so just keep moving and living.