this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2025
235 points (99.2% liked)

Selfhosted

51327 readers
553 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Wireguard is also very simple to setup. This would allow you to share other services you host in the future in a secure way as well.

[–] bagodogs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Your mom's Tizen TV doesn't have a Wireguard or Tailscale client, so you're going to be the person configuring her router, or setting up a Pi or something, as well as now being the designated tech support.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Its not hard to setup a proxy and use a full SSL cert. A little bit more complex but much simpler for the rest of the family.

[–] bagodogs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

You suggested Wireguard, not me. I'm pointing out how it isn't a great solution to the problem that was presented; you can safely access it remotely with a VPN, but then that isn't very useful for sharing with others, and you can expose the service to the internet at large, but then you're opening yourself to risk.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 hours ago

Yes that's why I suggested a alternative. Although wireguard is simpler to setup initially. Using proxy's and exposing your service directly is simpler for the end user. Both are not difficult to do.