It's really not something i consider worth my time and attention. I know your liberal programmed virtues tell you that supporting artists under capitalism with your dollar-vote is the done thing, but i don't agree and won't be wasting any more of my time trying to reason you out of such a convoluted position on something that barely matters.

[–] flatlined@anarchist.nexus 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You could play the world's smallest violin for them. Couldn't get paid for it apparently, but still.

More seriously, we probably disagree and I won't try to persuade you. Abolish capitalism and all that is preaching to the choir, but while we will live under it, if an artist you like has a direct way for your support (cash, bank transfer, crypto, whatever floats your boat) that doesn't fatten music labels, would/do you?

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe, if it were convenient. Won't be though, so it's not something I've considered at length. They went after the archives though, and I think the entire concept of paying for media should take any hit that can be issued in retaliation.

[–] KAtieTot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 20 hours ago

"Some media company sued the Internet archive so now I'm not paying any artists for their work or the media I consume" is entitled bullshit. Esp after acknowledging many struggle to pay rent.

Burn your CDs and listen to the silence. Maybe a thought will wander through your skull-cavern

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's an awfully defeatist way of looking at it, IMO.

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 points 12 hours ago

Do you, in the grocery store, grab every brand of pasta and figure out protein:carb:$ ratios manually, every time you walk down the aisle, or do you just decide whether you want pasta or not, and throw some in your bag if you do?

If the former, do you do this for every single thing in the store? How many hours does it take you every single time?