this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
57 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

64213 readers
1280 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eggdaddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Makes me wonder how much of this was due to IA having the federal deposit label now. That had to have chopped the lawsuit in half as they can legally hold all of that music. The confidential part speaks volumes.

and the artists will get zero

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Never pay for music again, and don't let anyone you know do that shit either.

They come for archives–nothing should be off limits.

[–] dr-robot@fedia.io 15 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

If you never pay for music, artists won't be able to make new music. Where possible buy as directly as possible from the artist, e.g., through bandcamp.

[–] Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 minutes ago

If you send the artist money in the form of a check or a donation more of that money goes to the person who produces the thing.

It's not possible to reach 100%, but every little bit of your dollar you ensure enters the pocket of a person who worked for a living is one less bit of that dollar that ends up in the hands of a leech or a parasite.

Giving Spotify or Google or Apple or whoever has inserted themselves into the system to absorb money for something that they don't pay for is fundamentally not healthy for any part of the ecosystem of art.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Open https://bandcamp.com/discover?s=rand and check how many albums have sold more than 5 copies.

How are those artists able to make music without making money? Because according to you, they can't.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 minutes ago

Because with your logic they'd make nothing.
Never heard of passion projects?

[–] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 hours ago

And concerts

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Artists can't pay rent now. They make music though.

I work for a better world. I do not look for excuses to reward corporations that steal from artists to burn libraries, thanks.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like "not paying artists" makes as much for a better world as "not tipping waitstaff".

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's really not something i consider worth my time and attention. I know your liberal programmed virtues tell you that supporting artists under capitalism with your dollar-vote is the done thing, but i don't agree and won't be wasting any more of my time trying to reason you out of such a convoluted position on something that barely matters.

[–] flatlined@anarchist.nexus 1 points 20 minutes ago

You could play the world's smallest violin for them. Couldn't get paid for it apparently, but still.

More seriously, we probably disagree and I won't try to persuade you. Abolish capitalism and all that is preaching to the choir, but while we will live under it, if an artist you like has a direct way for your support (cash, bank transfer, crypto, whatever floats your boat) that doesn't fatten music labels, would/do you?

[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 26 points 9 hours ago

The whole point of this lawsuit was to try and torpedo the Internet Archive. Would've been nice to know the explicit results from whatever settlement was reached. Was it for IA to just remove and ban the account that uploaded the works? I've no idea.

Either way, just the music labels making up numbers as usual to make the battle look unwinnable. Fucking pricks.

Never pay for music again, and don't let anyone you know do that shit either.

They come for archives; nothing should be off limits.