this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
558 points (96.8% liked)
People Twitter
8196 readers
1386 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A Cis white trades apprentice guy from a conservative family who has a history of listening to Nick Fuentes, a right-wing podcast dude who called for political violence toward the left, and has even chastised both Charlie kirk and Donald Trump
Would you have a source where I can read about that? I haven't been able to keep up with all the news
I’m pretty sure no source has confirmed he’s a Groyper. It’s just speculations.
All we know is that the shooter wasn’t particularly political.
The shooter's mom said he leaned left into the extremism of thinking gay and trans people deserve to have rights. Absolutely no other examples of leaning left, just that one thing.
The comment right above you says otherwise. With a link to a source. What do you have other than intuition?
That article doesn’t point to any specific. Citing the article:
This could be the most concrete evidence. The question is, what memes did he share? What were the texts showing he praised ”purity tests”? There’s nothing in the article, and I haven’t seen anything surface since.
The link between the inscriptions and the Groyper movement weak. Liking Helldivers 2 doesn’t make you a Groyper.
To me, this sounds more like the typical fashion of old people not understanding young people internet culture, and attribute anything they don’t understand to the alt right.
The rest of the article is just explaining the Groyper movement.
That link is kind of suspicious. I don't know how much faith you can put into it.
Propaganda exists and just having a link doesn't mean you're right.
https://eurweb.com/plot-twist-shocking-new-evidence-ties-kirks-accused-killer-to-far-right-leader-not-dems-who-maga-blamed-watch/
It's based on discord messages and the "Bella ciao" bullet so it could just be a coincidence or a throw off
Who are these investigators? Where are the discord messages? It's odd that the smoking gun of the article isn't shown or corroborated. Or am I missing it somewhere?