this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
110 points (100.0% liked)

WomensStuff

638 readers
322 users here now

Women only trans inclusive This is an inclusive community for all things women. Whether you're here for make up tips, feminism or just friendly chit chat, we've got you covered.

Rules…

  1. Women only… trans women are women, and transphobic or gender critical talk isn’t allowed. Anyone under the trans umbrella (e.g. non-binary, bigender, agender) is free to decide whether a women's community is a good fit for them.
  2. Don’t be a dick. No personal attacks, no aggression, play nice.
  3. Don’t hate on groups, hatefilled talk about groups is not allowed. Ever.
  4. No governmental politics, so no talk of Trump actions etc. We recommend Feminism@beehaw.org for that, but here is an escape from it.
  5. New accounts or users with few comments may have their posts removed to prevent spam and bad-faith participation.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Sometimes misandry can perpetuate the patriarchal power structures that caused misogyny to proliferate. All of the harmful effects of misogyny that go far beyond "hurt feelings" are because of systemic oppression of women. I don't think that framing things as "misandry = not a big deal, but misogyny = very bad" is productive in dismantling that system.

Personally, I've found that my feminism has been vastly improved by better understanding the shape of men's oppression under patriarchy. Some would disagree with my use of the word "oppression" here, but I stand by it. Privilege is often a poison pill; Hegemonic masculinity is the sword of Damocles that hangs over men and threatens them: "get in line, or else". The oppression that men face is not the same as what women face, both in terms of the shape and the magnitude of force. Frankly though, I don't care.

For me, solidarity starts with seeing a person and their struggles, without comparing them to others — the validity of someone's personhood doesn't depend on other people's plight. Abstract words like "misogyny" or "misandry" can be useful for capturing phenomena that exist on a larger scale than the individual, but it's important to question whether we are using them in a way that's liberatory, or perpetuating the cycles of oppression that harm so many of us. The OP feels to me like it's the latter — I will never feel comfortable with this kind of comparison that implicitly diminishes the suffering of a large group of people. It's not that I disagree per se, but I don't like this rhetoric.

That being said, I don't know OP, or the context of this post. We're judging it as a piece of political rhetoric here, but maybe it wasn't intended that way. Maybe someone was just venting with friends. God knows I've been there. Hell, this community is a good example of how valuable it can be to have a space to escape to. Being part of a marginalised group often feels like you're having to be on the clock all the time that you're out in public, and I know how exhausting that is (especially as a visibly queer, visibly disabled woman).

For everything I said above, I have had times where I've said things like "ugh, all men are trash" when venting about how exhausting it is to be a woman. This is a good example of what I meant about making an earnest effort to see a person and their struggles: the subtext of the OP is "I am exhausted and annoyed at having to constantly explain misogyny to people who seem to only care about men's issues when there's an opportunity to speak over a woman". That is something that I can heavily relate to. Indeed, as someone who considers men's liberation to be an essential part of her feminism, it's frustrating as hell to try to platform men's issues and make that part of the conversation, only for there to be crickets. But that's just a case of transparent bad faith. I've unfortunately learned that the people who complain the loudest about misandry often aren't interested in having productive conversations. It's a damn shame, because I do think that misandry is a problem that should be addressed, and it needn't be an either/or kind of conversation.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Misandry is a big deal. It's just that when compared to the consequences of misogyny it pales in comparison.

I don't think that men have an easy life. That same patriarchy that imprisons us imprisons them with different chains. The outcome, however, for misandry is essentially self-loathing, hurt feelings, outraged sense of justice.

But misogyny has all of those. Plus, you know, the added emotional beat-downs, the economic beat-downs, the social beat-downs, and the literal (sometimes lethal) physical beat-downs.

One is not like the other.

Personally I think the worse problem should be worked on before the lesser one. (I mean both can be worked on concurrently, but one of them has a higher priority should there be a conflict in time or energy or whatnot.)

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"Personally I think the worse problem should be worked on before the lesser one. (I mean both can be worked on concurrently, but one of them has a higher priority should there be a conflict in time or energy or whatnot.)"

I agree with most of your comment, but this part I disagree with. To give an analogy, I think this is like someone having an allergic reaction, and they have symptoms such as difficulty breathing, and also their eyes are stinging and streaming. Here, the burning eyes are analogous to misandry, and the breathing is analogous to misogyny. Obviously the latter is the far more serious symptom, and it often requires urgent intervention to mitigate the risk of breathing problems. However, merely treating the symptoms can only go so far: if someone keeps coming into contact with the allergen and needing to have urgent care to treat their symptoms, then it would be wise to zoom out and try to address the root cause of the problem (whether that be through attempting to treat the root allergy, or taking measures to avoid the root).

I don't like the framing of "the worse problem should be worked on before the lesser one" because it distracts from the fact that it's not just that we can work on them concurrently, but that we should do it that way, via tackling the underlying root systems that produce both misogyny and misandry. It's obvious in your comment that you understand that misogyny and misandry are often two sides of the same coin, but not everyone does understand that, and I feel that the either/or framing is unproductive.

Though I will also note though that in my allergy example, it would be utterly absurd if a doctor was trying to discuss long term allergy treatment while a person was actively experiencing an anaphylactic reaction and struggling to breathe. It is reasonable and necessary to do emergency first aid before we're able to have those kinds of long term discussions. Addressing the concrete harms of misogyny is like emergency first aid — it's far harder for a woman to consider her views on feminism and family if she's living somewhere with scary forced-birther laws, for example. But I think we need to keep our eye on the prize so to speak, and work to remember that we are striving to do more than just treat the symptoms of inequality

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 1 points 5 days ago

Though I will also note though that in my allergy example, it would be utterly absurd if a doctor was trying to discuss long term allergy treatment while a person was actively experiencing an anaphylactic reaction and struggling to breathe.

This is exactly what I think right here. Currently societies (some more than others) are experiencing huge degrees of anaphylaxis. Let's get women safe (the person breathing) first before we worry about men's fee-fees (eye drops). And once we've got the patient stabilized, we can start looking at long term management of the allergy.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

Thank you for taking the time to type that out. I concur.