this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
489 points (98.2% liked)

UK Politics

4264 readers
640 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 23 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

"I hate indians, they're a beastly people with a beastly religion"

-Winston Churchill

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 2 points 33 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago)

"Madam I may be drunk, but you are ugly, and in the morning I shall be sober."
~ Winston Churchill

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 27 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Perhaps I should have included a disclaimer, I'm certainly not quoting Churchill because I like him. As your quote demonstrates, he's a fucking racist asshole (among many other flaws) but gifted at the ol' soundbite.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Don't worry about it, I just like pointing it out

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

My 'favourite' of those kinds of quotes is"I do not admit ... that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place".

Not only is that full-on "racial hierarchy as justification for genocide" but it was in a speech arguing in favor of allowing the creation of the state of Isreal even though those pesky Palestinians were living in the proposed terrority. Thanks for your statesmanship Winny, that worked out great for everyone...

[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

"Sir, if you were my husband I'd poison your tea"

"Madam, if you were my wife I would drink it"

~~-Winston Churchill~~

  • Krunklom
[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Well sure. Thats colonization. Which is the basis for the existence of most countries. If you believe the U.S., Canada, Australia (and lots of others) have a right to exist, then you agree with Churchill.

[–] WiredBrain@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Can you articulate what you mean by a state having "a right to exist"?

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A moral rational to not be dissolved.

[–] WiredBrain@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The countries you mentioned were all built on a genocide of their indigenous inhabitants to establish an ethnostate. They each, however, have since at least acknowledged that ethnostates are bad and have structured their charters/constitutions on the principle of strict equality for its citizens.

Israel, on the other hand, is currently in the process of establishing a Jewish ethnostate with an outspoken intention of creating at best an apartheid state, if not a completely ethnically cleansed state.

I see a clear difference in ongoing behaviour, and I don't think the ideas are as conjoined as you present them.

This is a false equivalence.

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Well, first, I'm not sure that they do have a right to exist, and certainly not without some serious steps in acknowledging the issue and making meaningful reparations.

But more specifically, Churchill is saying that he doesn't even see that a "great wrong has been done" in the first place. Whether the benefits outweigh the harms or whether it's too late to fix historic wrongs are very different debates from "do you think it is wrong to genocide a people to colonise their land?".

And the reason it's important to acknowledge that historic wrongs were wrong, even if you can't do anything to change them, is because you are less likely to argue in favor of repeating the exact wrong again, as Big C is doing in that speech.