this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
346 points (99.4% liked)

politics

25700 readers
3635 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eRac 103 points 15 hours ago (5 children)

They did vote to restrict access to the Measels/Mumps/Rubella vaccine for children under 4. Monsters.

For those who don't know, that vaccine is the origin of the modern anti-vaccine movement. A company marketing stand-alone vaccines was mad that somebody made a combo vaccine, making theirs unmarketable, so they funded fraudulent studies to block it.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 45 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

These shots are a fucking nightmare for child. Not allowing combined formulations is them basically just jabbing you child in the arm 3 or 4 extra times just so some company can overcharge you for them.

The amount of times this administration has been standing in the room with me and wife while we're trying to make important decisions about OUR CHILD is fucking mind-boggling.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 27 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

My understanding is that they removed "MMRV" - the combined Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella - shot, presumably in favor of "MMR+V" - on Measles + Mumps + Rubella shot and a second Varicella shot, which has been the 'default' practice for under-4s anyway. Parents have had the option to use the 1-shot MMRV instead of the 2-shot MMR+V, and removing MMRV from recommendation will (I assume) eliminate that option.

Slightly ironic, given that RFK Jr was just complaining how kids these days have to get "90 injections" to be fully vaccinated, that the MMRV move will essentially add an injection to the vaccination schedule.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

You see!!! The government wants to jab you more! Check mate!

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not to second guess you but just out of interest, do you have a source?

[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Well it's a bit more than that. On the first day they voted to restrict access to MMR for under 4's, except they also voted an exemption that covered like half of American children.

Then on the 2nd day they had another vote to in fact cancel it for those children as well.

[–] wesley@yall.theatl.social 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't correct. They voted to recommend against the MMRV vaccine which MMR + Smallpox vaccine. Typically for under 4's these are done separately in something like 85% of cases unless the parent specifically requests them together.

So not much is changing regarding the MMR vaccine

[–] TWeaK@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

You're right that this isn't about MMR but MMRV, I hadn't looked into what the V was but it's chickenpox (varicella), not smallpox. The article doesn't make any mention of an MMR only vaccine, I would assume that they don't do one anymore and it has been supplanted by MMRV.

The story here is that they initially removed the recommendation for children under 4, but upheld it for free vaccines through the Vaccines for Children program. Then, the following day they re-did the vote again to cancel that exemption. As the Vaccines for Children is a federal program, they follow the recommendations so this means that they've cancelled pretty much all free MMRV vaccines.

[–] Subdivide6857@midwest.social 2 points 14 hours ago

This must be some of that innovation capitalism provides. Go capitalism! We’re number 1!