this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
445 points (98.3% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

8024 readers
46 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you are interested, here is a link where I tried to express my thoughts -- https://lemmy.world/post/36167196

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Here's the kicker - the moment we truly, internally commit to the product and make interesting things with it, is the moment they're gonna want to take it away and put it behind a paywall.
Or we'll be back to the Stone Age way before that.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is how it always goes - first you make the best product you can and sell it as cheap as you can to build a customer base, and once you've got customers then you squeeze them for as much money as possible.

Their problem at the moment is they're having trouble actually getting customers on board because the product isn't very good, so it's being pushed as hard as possible. Your betters have already decided that this is their next trillion dollar product, why won't the peasants just obey?!

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 3 points 4 days ago

It's missing two step for propert enshittification.

Once the users are locked in you get the companies on board to vomit ads on the users. Then squeeze advertisers too and reduce the product to the cheapest bare minimum.