Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Why does the netherlands do so many things well and seem completly bored talking about lol
That seems like a great implentation to me. Basically an explicit acknowledgement of the sociol contract
I'm really curious about this also! What makes some nations be, ehm, in a "sensible" state (in my eyes) and others not, given similar situations and options? We're by no means as cool as Iceland or Finland for example, eyeing metrics like happiness index and development index, but why not?
Being a small population and/or region seems to be a part of the success mix (my theory is that this makes the government be closer to the people as well as forcing trade since you're clearly better off working together than trying to navigate international politics alone), but there's plenty of counter-examples so it's clearly either not the only requirement or flat-out wrong. I tried reading a book on the topic but then the book doesn't adequately explain it either ^^ It seems to be an unsolved problem as of yet
Either way, despite the current government I guess I'm proud of the place I'm from. You get to decide your own life (factors including: people are multilingual, relatively low inequality, euthanasia available (not that I'd currently want to, but self-determination just seems like a good principle that a crazy number of countries don't yet have)), though iirc the rich are getting richer and both rich and poor citizens are currently voting to widen that gap (as well as other short- and long-term issues, strawman problems.. the usual). We'll see where we stand in 100 years. Maybe I shouldn't be proud, since all that I'm proud of was built by my forebears (particularly before privatisation, which has its pros but maybe not for every aspect of society) and it's my generation that has yet to stand the test of time ๐
aanyway, I didn't get this part:
Could you elaborate or rephrase?
The phrase that triggered my "completly board talking about" was right after saying a setup i see as awesome you say "which seems ok to me". This also seems inline with other dutch political takes ive seen, from bikes to red light districts to work place norms, where i see what would be a hotly talked about topic (both support and opposition) here in the US for me, is largely plainly talked about.
I cant say its wrong, as i seem to agree with coorolated polices, but it just seems in stark contrast to the American tendency to make this higher stakes and more exciting.
The closer government is something that makes alot of sense to me too. I find municple, town, county level politics much more grounded then my federal level decisions (which is more like EU scoped politics to me in comparison at about half the population but about the same land mass). State level, which an average of almost 6 million being represented by the goverment vs the 350 million the fed size has to represent, also seems more reasonable though in terms of action very limited.
I know one reform here id like is to expand the number of federal representives here to be scaled with population again. It was orginally scaled at 1 for every 30 thousand (which feels like a human scale of representation), but including our upper house its around 750,000 per elected member of congress.