this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
406 points (96.3% liked)
Microblog Memes
9362 readers
2872 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You can't convince me that something is not brown by pointing to things and saying they're brown. Imagine if I was trying to prove that a whale is not a mammal by showing you all kinds of land-dwelling mammals and saying, "no, this is a mammal" as if many examples of land mammals means that there are no marine mammals.
I am not, and never have, said that dark orange is something other than brown.
Here is a proper article about the perception of brown which states very plainly:
And by the way:
Yes, this is a conversation about semantics - that is - what words mean.
Nonsensical argument. You're the one going against correct terminology. The burden of "proof" lies with you.
You hint at the idea that we indeed perceive colors differently. But just because i don't know, and cant quite know how "brown" looks for you, the word "brown" is a specific combination of red, green and blue. It doesn't matter if you think other colors also "look" brown.
This is not about burden of proof, it's that you're trying to establish that brown is not dark yellow, which is not possible by giving other examples of what brown is. See: the example I already gave.
As for correct terminology I gave you a peer reviewed citation for mine so I'm content with that. You show no sign of even having read it so goodbye.