this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
139 points (96.6% liked)
Not The Onion
18334 readers
1510 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Under civil law, you can make contractual arrangements for things like marriage, divorce settlements and child custody that happen to mirror shari'a law, as long as they don't conflict with state or federal law. And if that's offensive to you, all you need to do is to change state law to make such specific arrangements non-enforceable.
Some provisions of some interpretations of shari'a are offensive to me, too. Those provisions are often not all that different from views of the Christian religious right on women's and children's rights.
It's also worth noting that there's not a single shari'a law system. It varies by sect of Islam, by which school of jurisprudence even within a single sect, and in many cases, by country too.
So the short version is that this Cleetus can't tell his ass from a hole in the ground and should STFU.