this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
175 points (98.3% liked)

politics

26031 readers
2294 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

🤣🤣🤣

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

This is a good example of why I don't think Vance will be able to supplant Trump. Trump is a master troll, he does a way better job of baiting people to keep engaging with him. You have to be the right kind of frustrating. Vance is just irksome, but not in a way that baits you or makes you wish you could try your hand at debating with him. Trump manages to make it so enticing to keep talking to him. He makes it feel like you might be able to get a good own in on him if you just try. But Vance is such a tryhard and just reads as this annoying little fly that you can just swat away

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 22 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

A master troll? He just leveraged the weaponization of hate and stupidity during a time of economic unrest.

I think you're giving him too much credit here.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Specific to his ability to keep the media engaged, i think it's that he's just exactly the right kind of stupid.

I think about how Ken M is so effective at dragging people into his stupidity...now that is BRILLIANT. Calculated. A true master.

Trump is merely a savant. Mozart to Ken M's Salieri.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 19 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

No he doesn't. Any time anyone asks Trump anything other than a fawning non-question, he just berates them and shuts them down. I've never seen him actually debate a single thing.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 12 hours ago

For sure, I'm not saying Trump actually debates anyone. It's just that his specific way of being obnoxious and combative is so much more effective at goading people into engaging with him.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 13 hours ago

No puppet! No puppet! You’re the puppet!

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think thats kind of the point of him; he makes donny look like a stateman in comparison. More to the point, I think hes meant to be a vessel to transfer the control of the maga party to someone else once Donny dies.

Donnie dies, he becomes president, maga goes into mourning. Pundits dismiss anyone trying to make a move for leadership, except whoever theil et al have chosen as the replacement, who gets to 'campaign' to the base without competition (everyone else gets told its not the time, to have respect for trump, and the nation is mounting etc)

After their new guy has had time to ingratiate himself to the magats, Vance nominates him to VP. The media then plays up Vance's unlikeability, and blames everything thats failing under trump right now on him- and hes either forced to step down, or 25thed as unfit, allowing the new guy to take the office of presidency. Bonus is if they can string out president vance until the halfway mark, the new guy gets 2 years that dont count as a term for him- meaning he can rule for 10 years before they have to worry about abolishing term limits or finding a new figurehead.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

This is a horrible outcome for us, but Vance should just choose MTG if he wants to go rogue and stay president. She’s definitely not going to be thiels pick, and she’s got enough cachet with the MAGA crowd to keep them happy. He might even think that would defang her, like it has with other VPs, but I think she’d find some way to steal the spotlight on a regular basis.

Again, I cannot stress enough that this would be the worst choice for anyone other than Vance and MTG