334
ICE tickets Chicago man with legal residency $130 for not having his papers on him: ‘It’s not fair…I’m a resident’
(www.chicagotribune.com)
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2025
334 points (98.8% liked)
News
32744 readers
4048 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And if he had his papers, they would have said they were fake, confiscated them, and hassled him anyway:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/24/us-citizen-detained-ice-real-id
Which is why we have the 4th amendment.
Edit: dumpster fire beyond this point. I am employing a zero tolerance blocking policy for non-sequitur doomer bullshit. It doesn't create a conversation, it just capitulates to fascism. I've got no room for you in my online spaces.
Oh cute, you think The Constitution still matters to those in power
I think it's pretty clear that many in power don't believe the constitution applies to them. That's not doomerism, because my answer isn't "therefore we must give up."
Oh cool, guess we abandon law then.
It is doomerism. It's non-sequitur bullshit.
My response isn't "abandon law" either.
But if we surrender in advance things will be better for us…🤪
Who the fuck said anything about surrendering anything?
SpaceNoodle?
Nope.
My bad. This thread has me feeling like I'm taking crazy pills.
Sick of the insane amount of doomer bullshit o Lemmy.
Totally. I was just steaming over three other threads with the top comment being typical Lemmy doomer BS.
I understand why it didn’t come across as a “yes, and” comment. I just find little to no value to commenting/replying to trolls where my reply probably would have made more immediate sense. I’d rather talk to you…
More doomer bullshit.
Just blocking this nonsense at this point. Bye!
The 4th has been nullified by the Supreme Court. Look up the case Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo.
The constitution requires an enormous process to be amended. A single ruling does not change the existence of the 4th amendment.
The suggestion that a single ruling would "nullify" a constitutional amendment is so far removed from reality, I can only suggest you go read a fucking book.
What the fuck is going on with this smooth brain bullshit in this comment section?
Laws only work if they are upheld. Burying your head in the sand and pretending like this shit isn't happening won't fix it.
Okay blocked. No space for shitheads like this.
Read a book.
How about you look around instead and see what's happening in America and how it's becoming fascist.
Or you can read that in history books in 50 years.
If he read Fahrenheit 451 he would know that we won't have history books in the future anymore