282
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Lyft is introducing a new feature that lets women and non-binary riders choose a preference to match with drivers of the same gender.

The ride-hailing company said it was a “highly requested feature” in a blog post Tuesday, saying the new feature allows women and non-binary people to “feel that much more confident” in using Lyft and also hopefully encourage more women to sign up to be drivers to access its “flexible earning opportunities.”

The service, called “Women+ Connect,” is rolling out in the coming months. Riders can turn on the option in the Lyft app, however the company warns that it’s not a guarantee that they’ll be matched with a women or non-binary person if one of those people aren’t nearby. Both the riders and drivers will need to opt-in to the feature for it work and riders must chose a gender for it to work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a neat feature; I wonder why it's explicitly not available to men (who would prefer a male driver for whatever reason)... I guess maybe they feel that would go against the stated goal of encouraging more women to sign up as drivers, but like... why? If nothing else, men with a preference for male drivers would ensure that more women / non-binary folks could get drivers matching their gender, since as they note there's far more non-male riders than drivers.

I also wonder if it gives non-male drivers the option to only accept riders who match their gender, which it seems would be the more important facet to encouraging non-male drivers, if safety concerns are the reason they're not signing up to do so.

[-] popololote -2 points 1 year ago

Maybe it's about men preferring female drivers and making it harder for other to get them. Woman may request a female driver to feel safer but men provably don't do it so much for that reason.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 51 points 1 year ago

It specifically says it lets riders request a driver matching their own gender, not any gender you want.

[-] Willy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social -1 points 1 year ago

If you're non-binary, or not male, then you fall under this policy anyway; it only doesn't apply to male-identifying males.

[-] XbSuper@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

But couldn't someone just claim to identify that way, and abuse the system? This is a really dumb idea.

[-] subignition@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, sure, any system can be abused, but it's a lot easier to prove intent when you now have to commit fraud to get in the situation to begin with.

[-] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is it even legally fraud to identify as non-binary when you are not?

[-] subignition@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

In the hypothetical provided, where someone intentionally misrepresents themselves in order to qualify for a service from a business that they otherwise would not have? For the express purpose of easier access to victims?

Not a lawyer but I'd certainly think so.

[-] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Does that mean that non-binary riders are only paired up with non-binary drivers, or are non-binary people and women grouped together?

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

All we have to go by is what's in the article, which says:

Lyft is introducing a new feature that lets women and non-binary riders choose a preference to match with drivers of the same gender.

That's kind of open to interpretation; either they're calling non-binary a separate gender and matches people accordingly, or they're really saying "Woman - biological and trans - can choose a preference to match with woman drivers".

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
282 points (88.5% liked)

News

23274 readers
3192 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS