Maybe it's just for the catharsis.
This is actually an interesting question. How is age handled in a space-age civilization? Someone born on one planet could be 10 while on a different planet they'd be 50 in the same timeframe. What if you spend part of your life on one and the rest on another? It'd be inconvenient to use one planet's 'day' as the standard, as they'd all be different lengths...
The only downside is that the participants need to be familiar enough with their chosen game to do a randomizer which means roping in casual players is difficult.
Casual players can be fine with some games. Some actually become easier with Archipelago (e.g. Noita, Risk of Rain 2) since you're getting meta-progression between runs that normally wouldn't be there. Others though are especially punishing for new players (Doom comes to mind - you have to be pretty intimately familiar with the levels. There's keys hidden in secret areas sometimes, for example, and ammo can be very scarce.)
The app I was using was making it look like everything I was replying to was from the same poster, when in fact it was not. I've already apologized for that error.
The only circumstance under which I would support a revolution is if the government simply ceases to function (which it may, now, under Trump - who knows? But I don't wish to bank on that possibility, nor do I wish to cause a non-functioning government simply to justify a revolution; that's no better than Republicans grinding everything to a standstill then claiming that their ability to do so is evidence that the government isn't working.) The pragmatic stance is to vote for the better of the candidates who can reasonably win elections while directing effort towards changing the reasons why we only have two candidates to choose from.
Revolution that isn't supported by the majority of people is simply imposing a viewpoint on people who do not want it, and even if it would ultimately be better for them in the long run, it's no better than Christian Nationalists trying to impose their viewpoint on everyone else.
If it is supported by the majority of people, it should be able to be resolved via the democratic process. What's stopping that right now is the two-party system that we're stuck in, and that can't be resolved without voting reform, so that's where I'm choosing to direct my efforts. It's not that it will single-handedly change society, but it's the first step in a process that will, theoretically, allow new, more progressive and left-leaning parties to rise to relevance.
There have been multiple states that have had ranked-choice voting on their ballots (including mine), but they largely haven't passed, so I would argue that yes, it is feasible to achieve it without revolution, but thus far it seems that people don't understand why it's needed (and therefore it's a matter of getting the word out and raising awareness), or they simply disagree with it and want to maintain the status quo (and if that's honestly the majority opinion, and it's not just a perception or information problem, then so be it - that just means that we're in a minority and we shouldn't be forcing the majority to bend to our viewpoint any more than they should be forcing us to bend to theirs.).
Look, I think we agree on a lot of things. I support many socialist views; capitalism is an awful system, corporate greed and income inequality and money in politics are some of the biggest problems with society and some of the biggest inhibitors to change. However, I don't think communism is a viable solution. In my opinion, the ideal solution would still allow accumulation of personal wealth, but would distribute wealth based on how much good a person has brought to society, rather than on how much of a sociopath they're willing to be to get it. I believe most people are greedy and I believe most people are motivated by personal gain moreso than anything else. Not everyone, obviously, but most people, and I think the only way we're going to get people to abandon the 'Fuck you, got mine' attitude is by rewarding behaviors we want to reinforce, which capitalism obviously does not do.
The first time someone shoots one down, they're going to make it so that downing a drone has the same criminal penalty as attacking an officer. Mark my words.
I use the default config with the sensitivity turned up to 225% (which makes the touchpad's left-right width equate to a bit more than the full screen width); that works fine for me. I play a lot of deckbuilders, point-and-click style games, isometric RPGs, tactics games, or just generally older / indie titles that don't have good native controller support, and it's been a lifesaver for those.
It doesn't feel as good as a mouse, I won't claim that it does, but it makes those games go from "unplayable" to "playable" and that's the jump I was looking for.
The omission of the thumb touchpad the Deck has is a huge blow. A lot of PC games aren't built for gamepads, and being restricted only to things that are (or to using an analog stick as a pointing device) is really limiting.
Also, that price point, holy shit. That's like, high-end desktop PC price range. I guess there's got to be people who are looking for this, but it's like... the crowd who would be choosing between a $1500 gaming laptop or this; that's not really the demographic I'd expect to be in the market for a handheld, but maybe I'm just wrong on that.
Man, Gameboys had a backlight in the Pokemon universe? We got cheated.
If the DNC was thinking ahead even the slightest bit, they'd be planning to do everything they can to publicize the impact Trump's policies are having in real-time. Getting messaging out to everyone who is negatively impacted every time Trump does something, making sure they understand exactly what is happening, and why, would be a lot more effective than their usual strategy of doing nothing until a few months before an election then trying to convince people who've been told for years that democrats are the devil that Trump has been hurting them.
Contact these people personally. "Hi - Trump's policies mean you will no longer be covered by the ACA; here's some information on other, far worse and more expensive, insurance options. This is how much this is likely to cost you. Please contact your representative if you find this to be distressing."
Every time I see this, I can't help but feel like it works better without the third panel. Showing it happening dulls the comedic impact of the final panel. Anyone who doesn't know what Kirby is about isn't going to understand the comic anyway, and anyone who does doesn't need the third panel to understand what happened.
Criminal criminal defense lawyer. If you suspect you might be victimized by one, you can hire a criminal criminal defense defense lawyer to protect you.