106
submitted 1 year ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/steamdeck@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WrittenWeird@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ReactOS remains my biggest "But why?" tech story for the past ~20 years.

[-] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Linux doesn't work for most people, and Windows and Mac are corporate. I hope ReactOS succeeds.

[-] WrittenWeird@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I mean I wish them the best, but they've been chasing Windows for decades, at what point exactly is this "success" to be measured?

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

When they're successful, it will be a good day. For now, it's all about having fun with the journey.

[-] klangcola@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

Surely contributing to Wine and running their windows apps on Linux would yield better faster results than re-implement Windows from scratch. I don't quite see who the target audience is

[-] swab148@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

I agree with you, an open-source OS that could run anything Windows-related would probably be preferable for the average user over switching to something completely new and hoping you can find a workaround or compatibility layer, simply because it's a lot more work. If ReactOS had been around and on par with Linux 20 years ago (oh gosh I'm that old...), I probably would've gone with that on the old PowerBook my grandma gave me rather than Ubuntu, just because I'd been using Windows. At the time, installing Ubuntu was, while the easiest way to get Linux, still not very easy, and I did bork the first hard drive. That said, I don't regret my decision, and I probably wouldn't ever go back to Windows, but I might still give ReactOS a try!

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

If it does, a corporation will buy and use it

[-] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It's FOSS. I'd imagine people would fork it, because fuck it

[-] WrittenWeird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, they won't.

The value in Windows is no longer Windows. The cost of Windows license to a business is trivial. It's all the associated services. Office, teams, SharePoint, active directory, Outlook. And the ecosystems and support that exist for them all.

Any realistic business that tries to be competitive by not paying for Windows licenses and instead buying this, is utterly delusional.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I hate these types of reactions.

The answer to that dead ass question is always "why not?"

[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

There's a lot of WinXP software out there that people bought licenses for and still want to use.

[-] whatupwiththat@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

The BEST Need for Speed EVER!!!

[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Shift works fine on modern windows and proton what are you talking about.

[-] WrittenWeird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Nothing worng with running XP in a VM or network isolated machine. Stability will be more important to these people than anything.

[-] nicman24@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

embedded probably

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
106 points (94.9% liked)

Steam Deck

5727 readers
1 users here now

Universal community link
!steamdeck@lemmy.ml

Rules

Order

Models

64GB eMMC LCD
256GB NVMe LCD
512GB NVMe LCD
512GB NVMe OLED
1TB NVMe OLED

Allowed languages

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS