316
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 96 points 1 year ago

Yahuh... now do one for police unions.

[-] Arrakis@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Aw come on now, we can't be holding our public servants to account for their actions now can we? You silly billy

[-] jhulten@infosec.pub 12 points 1 year ago

Oh sweetie... They're not servants of the PUBLIC...

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Well unless by public you mean the public sector of the economy and their property, then yes they're specifically intended to protect that (alongside private infrastructure owned by their lobbyists and benefactors) at the cost of everyone else.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Police should have to carry professional insurance just like doctors carry malpractice insurance.

Change my mind.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 13 points 1 year ago

I don't think it will work at all. I think it would make the problem much worse, not better.

Think about that for a second: Police are never convicted, and rarely officially sanctioned. They always get away with it. Insurance will never pay out, so the cost of insuring officers will be next to nothing.

But, now we have an insurer with a vested interest in clearing the officer of wrongdoing, lest they be forced to pay a claim.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

We have a insurer with a vested interest in ensuring the officer doesn't fuck up in the first place. Insurers don't want claims at all, because whether they win or lose thats still money being spent, albeit more in the latter case.

Rates would go up due to the numerous claims against Officer McShooty (even if defended) and he wouldn't be able to afford it. He goes to another department? If they have insurance he's still in the system so...

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

I think what would actually happen is the the insurer would demand Officer McShooty sue these claimants for harassment, defamation of character, and receive the bulk of any awarded damages.

The overwhelming majority of absurd lawsuits, (like where an aunt sues her nephew for hugging her too hard) aren't brought by the named plaintiff, but by the plaintiff's insurer. The aunt isn't actually suing the nephew. The aunt's medical insurance sues the nephew's homeowner's or liability insurance.

I saw a video awhile back that presented a related argument. If everyone had life insurance, and those life insurance companies were all prepared to sue on our behalf, we would never have another wrongful death at the hands of a cop. Our insurers would sue the everyloving fuck out of the department to avoid being stuck with that bill. Facing formidable legal repercussions, police departments would finally have an incentive to clean house.

They'd have to work a week of overtime to afford the sky high cost.

[-] techwithjake@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Cause they don't already abuse the OT system?

My joke was a little too subtle.

[-] techwithjake@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Fair enough. Text is hard to read sometimes. Cheers!

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
316 points (95.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35440 readers
553 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS