654

Judge Newman has threatened to have staff arrested, forcibly removed from the building, and fired. She accused staff of trickery, deceit, acting as her adversary, stealing her computer, stealing her files, and depriving her of secretarial support. Staff have described Judge Newman in their interactions with her as “aggressive, angry, combative, and intimidating”; “bizarre and unnecessarily hostile”; making “personal accusations”; “agitated, belligerent, and demonstratively angry”; and “ranting, rambling, and paranoid.” Indeed, interactions with Judge Newman have become so dysfunctional that the Clerk of the Court has advised staff to avoid interacting with her in person or, when they must, to bring a co-worker with them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

I'm all for term limits and an end to lifetime appointments, but maybe it's time we start pulling back on the idea that people are useless and incompetent the moment they turn 65. I don't really think putting an expiration date on human beings is a good thing.

[-] themajesticdodo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

What does your comment have to do with the article? She's 94 and is pretty obviously in mental decline...

[-] Sami_Uso@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It has nothing to do with the article, just the general vibe of every comment section talking about old people turns into a circle jerk about when people are no longer valuable to society.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know that anybody is realistically saying that, I'm sure some assholes do and I often group all the "olds" together when I am frustrated. There are many things at play here:

  • government appointments for life (or until retirement) mean that powerful government positions are basically unavailable for younger generations
  • American work ethic tells you it is good to work until you die and not "freeload"
  • Some people that get power like it and will not willingly relinquish it
  • we have not aptitude tests for really anything beyond what it takes to get hired

I don't know what the right and fair solution is, but it feels like government appointments should have a time limit. What that is I don't know what is reasonable

[-] smegger@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm a fan of the concept of performance based appointments. When they fail to perform they risk losing their position.

That way, no complaints of ageism or whatever

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah but what does adequate "performance" for a judge mean? Can we quantify it?

Who is in charge of enforcing it?

[-] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Some people die young, some people die old. Some people get Alzheimer's in their 30s or 40s, others remain sharp up till death at 95. I could see a specific age as a guideline but to say "you're 70, off you go to pasture" is just as wrong as keeping on someone clearly incompetent.

[-] deanimate@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Please read article next time

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
654 points (97.1% liked)

News

22890 readers
5857 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS