298
The End of Trump Inc.
(www.theatlantic.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
298 points (95.4% liked)
politics
19090 readers
4158 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What's the chances he gets this overturned on appeal? He mean he had bad council. He could use that and get a new trial?
IANAL, but Ineffective Assistance of Counsel is well known to be extremely difficult to pull off, and even more so in civil cases. And, as I understand it, Trump’s sole basis for asserting it would be that the paperwork to receive a jury trial wasn’t filed properly, which resulted in a bench trial. Given that the judge otherwise provided acceptable due process to Mr. Trump, and the case appears to have been decided on clearly established facts and relevant law, I find it hard to believe that an appeal would work here.
Flipping to a different angle: Lawyers constantly fuck up paperwork; if the system allowed paperwork goofs to trigger new trials, it would bog courts down and provide an attack vector for attorneys to take advantage of.
Alex Jones’ lawyer sent his entire phone’s data to the opposing counsel, and he didn’t get a new trial. Now if that’s not a bad lawyer, I don’t know what is.
I doubt trump will get a new trial. I’m not even sure there’s a decent lawyer left in the country that would work that idiot.
Was that the same one he had when he said the reason he didn't know his own children's ages in a custody hearing was that he ate some chili the night before and it was spicy?
Because no matter how crazy legal cases have gotten, I don't think I'll ever forget that gem
Look up the Twinkie Defense, when you have a moment.
Alex Jones still hasnt paid a dime of the 1.5 billion he owes either.. he never will and I doubt trump ever will pay any of these settlements either.
I was thinking them being morons and being fined because they kept using same defense even after judge said to stop.
Oh, I feel pretty confident that any lawyer would say there is less than zero chance of that forming the basis of an IAC claim.
Good I hope they turn Trump Hotel into a homeless shelter.
Nah, low income housing would piss him off more.
Or, better yet, turn it into a multi-cultural heritage center.
Hell it would I bet he hate knowing homeless people took over his places. But apparently he has many so we can do both and see which he hates more.
Quick send him a poll lets see what he thinks?
As gross as it makes me feel to say it, filling it with as many non-white people as possible would probably give him an aneurism.
Also NAL, but iirc part of that claim is that the trial would have gone differently otherwise. And I think we all know there was never any chance of that, except maybe not getting sanctioned.
Regardless, he'll drag it out till well after he has died of old age. The american legal system literally cannot touch anyone with money or power... see Matt Gatez for many many examples.
Even if they do get a settlement, I doubt trump will ever have to pay most of it, just like we dont see Alex Jones paying any of the billion dollars he owes people either. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/18/us/politics/alex-jones-bankruptcy.html
With enough money, you can literally plead guilty of raping your 4yo daughter and have no consequences at all.
That would be more able to work if he was a poor person. Instead he's (allegedly) insanely rich, and actively chose poor council