101
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A massive health care strike over wages and staffing shortages headed into its final day on Friday without a deal between industry giant Kaiser Permanente and the unions representing the 75,000 workers who picketed this week.

The three-day strike carried out in multiple states will officially end Saturday at 6 a.m., and workers were expected to return to their jobs in Kaiser’s hospitals and clinics that serve nearly 13 million Americans. The two sides did not have any bargaining sessions scheduled after concluding their talks midday Wednesday.

The strike for three days in California — where most of Kaiser’s facilities are located — as well as in Colorado, Oregon and Washington was a last resort after Kaiser executives ignored the short-staffing crisis worsened by the coronavirus pandemic, union officials said. Their goal was to bring the problems to the public’s consciousness for support, according to the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions. Some 180 workers from facilities in Virginia and Washington, D.C., also picketed but only on Wednesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

A three-day strike? What the hells the point of that?

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a fact of hospital labor that when workers go on strike, some patients will not receive adequate care. The people working in healthcare are super passionate about their patients and don't want them to suffer. Short term strikes are a way to perform intermittent striking without losing legal protections, while also meeting the needs of patients. If Kaiser can't find an agreement though, they will go on a much longer strike like in 2021

[-] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Correct. This is usually seen as a warning shot. If kaiser doesn't get their shit together then they actually strike.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Their employers care less about the patients than the employees and are ecstatic that their doctors won't let the patients die, because the employer absolutely would let the patients die if it came down to it. I don't know what the alternative is but if you tell them you're coming back, they're not even going to sweat.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

the thing about intermittent strikes, is that they're super successful. This is because they are highly unpredictable. The disruptions caused by a short term, unpredictable strike means that scabs are exceedingly difficult to have on hand as a contingency. This in turn means that it's more disruptive to operations (and profits) than a long haul strike.

[-] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

To give KP a taste of what would happen if KP doesn't agree to the Union's terms

Not every strike is a months-long "The company must agree to every demand or we're going to strike until we starve to death" event

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, not every strike is effective.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It can let the employer know that the employees are absolutely willing to strike while also not putting patients' lives at risk. Even short strikes can be a massive headache for the company.

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
101 points (100.0% liked)

News

23320 readers
2989 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS