759
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bear@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Why not? Public institutions are supposed to serve the public's interests.

[-] cricket97@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Because I don't want to give some unelected bureaucrats the ability to discommunicate someone because they said something stupid. Public goods are meant to serve the public, even if they have bad opinions.

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

I think the limit should be pretty high, but I'm fine with, as an example, people who spread abject hatred being rejected by most parts of society. I think not spreading hatred against your fellows is an integral part of the social contract.

[-] cricket97@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

What about someone who doesn't think that transgender women are women? Should they be rejected by society for holding that view?

[-] bear@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
759 points (97.3% liked)

Not The Onion

12189 readers
560 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS