view the rest of the comments
3DPrinting
3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.
The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io
There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml
Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
-
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
-
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
-
Do not create links to reddit
-
If you see an issue please flag it
-
No guns
-
No injury gore posts
If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)
Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible
I’m not entirely sure what’s going on… I’d have to check the model (and even then… slicers can do things weird).
That said, my guess is that the model’s base isn’t perfectly flat it looks like it tried to generate some rafting, but was too close or something to generate proper support.
My advice is to check the gcode in your slicer- that’ll show you if it’s a gcode issue or a printer issue.
If it’s gcode, try raising it by 1mm off the plate and tell it to generate support every where. If you’re using Prusa slicer, maybe consider the tree supports
I was going to suggest the opposite - lower the model .5 mm in to the platter to cut a clean bottom and ensure it's flush.
that works too, assuming it lowers it enough to get a sizeable patch. either way will get a decent print. They're already printing with supports, however, so the loss in quality from janky support removal isn't in play.
(ah crap. Sorry for the pun.)
Thanks, I'll check that.